Objectives: To assess the impact of posterior corneal asphericity on postoperative calculation error using the Haigis-L and the Barrett formulas for eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods: We assessed the mean absolute error (MAE) of two power calculation formulas, Barrett true-K and Haigis-L formulas, in a retrospective analysis of 34 eyes of 34 patients who underwent cataract surgery. We performed a regression analysis between corneal parameters (anterior and posterior Q values, Kmax, K1, and K2) and the MAE of each formula.

Results: In the cohort, 11 eyes were of women and 23 of men. The average age of the study population was 66.5±8.6 years. The mean axial length was 24±4.7 mm, the mean anterior chamber depth was 3.27±0.7 mm, and the mean posterior Q-value was -0.15±0.28. The MAE of Haigis-L and Barrett true-K formulas were 0.72 and 0.68, respectively (P=0.54). The regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship only between the error in refraction prediction and the posterior Q-value regardless of the formula used. The coefficient of determination was higher for the Barrett true-K formula (r=0.52; R2=0.28; P<0.05), compared with the Haigis-L (r=0.49; R2=0.25; P<0.05).

Conclusions: Posterior corneal surface asphericity influences the refractive error of calculation using both Haigis-L and Barrett true-K formulas for eyes after a myopic PRK or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000877DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barrett true-k
12
posterior corneal
8
corneal asphericity
8
power calculation
8
calculation error
8
laser situ
8
situ keratomileusis
8
keratomileusis photorefractive
8
photorefractive keratectomy
8
haigis-l barrett
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in eyes with keratoconus (KCN) poses significant challenges. While various formulas, including KCN-specific ones, have been investigated, the optimal calculation method remains inconclusive.

Methods: The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023483119).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Total keratometry versus standard keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with keratoconus.

Int Ophthalmol

November 2024

Anterior Segment Surgery Department, Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera en México I.A.P., Vicente García Torres 46, Barrio San Lucas, CP 04030, Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico.

Purpose: To describe the accuracy of monofocal intraocular lens power calculation in patients with keratoconus using total keratometry (TK) and standard keratometry (K) with conventional and keratoconus-modified formulas.

Setting: Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Design: Observational, retrospective, non-randomized, comparative study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This retrospective study compared postoperative prediction errors of recent formulas using standard- or total keratometry (K or TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post-myopic LASIK patients. It included 56 eyes of 56 patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery, with at least 1-month follow-up at Keio University Hospital in Tokyo or Hayashi Eye Hospital in Yokohama, Japan. Prediction errors, absolute errors, and percentage of eyes with prediction errors within ± 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To compare the accuracy of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry using the ORA VLynk system with different biometry-based formulas in short and long eyes after cataract surgery.

Methods: This prospective study considered 48 eyes with axial lengths of <22.1 mm and 48 eyes with axial lengths of >25.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!