AI Article Synopsis

  • Malnutrition is a significant yet often overlooked issue in hospitals, with studies showing that 23.6% of patients are at risk, which leads to longer hospital stays and increased mortality rates.
  • The research evaluated data from over 55,000 patients to analyze the effects of malnutrition on patient outcomes and the financial impact of improved screening and coding processes.
  • Optimizing the management of malnutrition can lead to better patient care and increase hospital reimbursements by better documenting malnutrition severity and related diagnoses.

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Despite its negative impact on patients and health care expenditures, malnutrition remains an under-recognized problem in hospitals. The objectives were thus: 1) to study the prevalence of malnutrition risk, protein-calorie malnutrition and cachexia in a Belgian tertiary care hospital, 2) to evaluate the impact thereof on patient outcomes, and 3) to evaluate the impact of optimizing malnutrition screening, diagnosing, registration and coding on hospital reimbursement.

Methods: Data was included from all multi-day admissions between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. The NRS2002 was used as screening tool. Patient outcomes were modeled using (generalized) linear mixed models, with pathology and severity of illness as random effects. The financial impact of the screening, diagnosing and registration process was evaluated comparing net revenues related to a malnutrition diagnosis in the year before (2017) and the year after (2019) the optimization process.

Results: 55,345 patients were evaluated for malnutrition risk at admission of whom 23.6% are considered malnourished or at risk for malnutrition, 0.6% have cachexia and 4.6% protein-calorie malnutrition. Overall length of stay is 2.2 days (p < 0.001) longer in the at-risk population, and 6.2 and 5.0 days longer in patients with cachexia and protein-calorie malnutrition as compared to patients not at risk. Odds ratio for in-hospital mortality is 2.9 (p < 0.001) for the at-risk patients and 3.0 (p < 0.001) for patients with cachexia. Optimization of dietetic workflow and registration, specifying malnutrition severity and facilitating malnutrition coding can increase hospital reimbursement, with approximately 0.4% of all justified beds.

Conclusions: Malnutrition still affects both patients and health care finances. Patients at risk for, or having malnutrition at admission have worse outcomes than those without. Importantly, hospital reimbursement for these patients can effectively be increased by implementing an automated nutritional screening and diagnosing protocol with optimized dietetic registration and enhanced nutritional coding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.01.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

malnutrition risk
12
patient outcomes
12
malnutrition
9
impact patient
8
protein-calorie malnutrition
8
evaluate impact
8
screening diagnosing
8
diagnosing registration
8
impact
5
risk severity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!