Despite evidence that most who perpetrate intimate partner violence (IPV) also report victimization, little is known about bidirectional IPV among Emergency Department (ED) patients and its association with problem drinking and marijuana use. We conducted an observational, cross-sectional survey among low- and moderate-acuity patients at a Northern California safety-net ED. Physical IPV was measured with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). We recorded patient's frequency of intoxication and marijuana use. Spouse/partner's problem drinking and marijuana use were measured dichotomously. Odds Ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models of unidirectional and bidirectional IPV. Among 1,037 patients (53% female), perpetration only, victimization only, and bidirectional IPV were reported by 3.8%, 6.2%, and 13.3% of the sample, respectively. Frequency of intoxication was associated with perpetration (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92) and bidirectional IPV (OR=1.34; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.58). Days of marijuana use were associated with bidirectional IPV (OR=1.15; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.28). Patients whose partners were problem drinkers were at risk for victimization (OR=2.56; 95% CI=1.38, 4.76) and bidirectional IPV (OR=1.97; 95% CI 1.18, 3.27). Among patients who reported any past-year IPV, most experienced bidirectional aggression. ED staff should consider asking patients who are married, cohabiting, or in a dating relationship about their experience with past-year IPV and inquire about their substance use patterns and those of their romantic partner, to share information about potential linkages. Medical and recreational marijuana legalization trends underscore the importance of further research on IPV and marijuana.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942128PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.11.1.57DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bidirectional ipv
24
problem drinking
12
drinking marijuana
12
ipv
11
bidirectional
8
unidirectional bidirectional
8
partner violence
8
victimization bidirectional
8
frequency intoxication
8
95% 118
8

Similar Publications

About one-third of sexual minority men (SMM) report intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, and one-fourth report IPV perpetration, in their lifetime. IPV disclosure and help seeking are key processes of coping with or managing exposure to abuse. We surveyed 500 SMM residing across the United States who enrolled in project EROS (Empowering Relationships and Opportunities for Safety).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Most IPV research only looks at either the perpetrators or the victims, but this study highlights that many cases involve both, known as bidirectional IPV.
  • A study of over 1,150 post-9/11 Veterans found three distinct IPV patterns: Low to no IPV, Bidirectional Psychological IPV, and Bidirectional Multiform IPV, with no significant gender differences in reported rates.
  • Factors like race, employment status, child care, and history of violence were linked to the different IPV patterns, indicating the need for better comprehensive screening and treatment strategies for Veterans dealing with IPV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study on college students examined the relationship between cyber intimate partner violence (IPV) and in-person IPV, suggesting that cyber IPV may increase the likelihood of experiencing in-person IPV.
  • The research surveyed 236 students over 60 days and found that those who experienced or perpetrated cyber IPV were more likely to engage in psychological and sexual IPV on the same or following day.
  • The findings indicate that cyber IPV is an important factor in understanding and preventing both online and in-person IPV among college students, highlighting the need for targeted prevention programs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bidirectional intimate partner violence (IPV) appears highly prevalent, but the extant literature, which has been dominated by work in North America, has not adequately accounted for how victimization overlaps with perpetration and how potential resources may interact with risk factors. A community sample of Spanish women completed measures of IPV approval, mental health risk factors (psychological distress and problematic substance use), and interpersonal resources (partner and social satisfaction). Using Mplus accounting for victimization and perpetration overlap, findings indicate that greater psychological distress and substance use were associated with IPV perpetration, and lower IPV approval was linked to victimization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern among young adults and has shown a consistent association with alcohol use. However, previous research has used cross-sectional and daily diary designs that may fail to pinpoint the effects of alcohol use within several hours of IPV occurring. The present study used novel ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to investigate the bidirectional effect of alcohol use and IPV victimization among young adults with a history of IPV perpetration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!