Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The clinical value of conventional transabdominal and transvaginal sonography (endosonography) for the evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment between 14 and 36 weeks' gestation was evaluated in 20 unselected obstetric patients. Sonographic evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment was adequately depicted in 76% with the transabdominal technique compared to 83% with the transvaginal approach. According to set guidelines, these preliminary results suggest that the transvaginal technique may be superior in obtaining an adequate evaluation of the lower uterine segment and cervix and may offer an advantage of not depending on a fully distended bladder for evaluation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80006-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!