AI Article Synopsis

  • Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium is a tough bacteria that causes infections and is hard to treat due to limited effective drugs.
  • Researchers tested two strains of this bacteria to see how well they could be treated using bacteriophages that specifically target and kill bacteria, combined with antibiotics like daptomycin (DAP) and ampicillin (AMP).
  • The study found that using phages with specific antibiotics was more effective at killing the bacteria than using any single treatment alone and also reduced the chances of the bacteria developing resistance.

Article Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterococcus faecium is a challenging pathogen known to cause biofilm-mediated infections with limited effective therapeutic options. Lytic bacteriophages target, infect, and lyse specific bacterial cells and have anti-biofilm activity, making them a possible treatment option. Here, we examine two biofilm-producing clinical E. faecium strains, daptomycin (DAP)-resistant R497 and DAP-susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) HOU503, with initial susceptibility to E. faecium bacteriophage 113 (ATCC 19950-B1). An initial synergy screening was performed with modified checkerboard MIC assays developed by our laboratory to efficiently screen for antibiotic and phage synergy, including at very low phage multiplicity of infection (MOI). The data were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey (HSD) tests. In 24 h time kill analyses (TKA), combinations with phage-DAP-ampicillin (AMP), phage-DAP-ceftaroline (CPT), and phage-DAP-ertapenem (ERT) were synergistic and bactericidal compared to any single agent (ANOVA range of mean differences 3.34 to 3.84 log10 CFU/mL; p < 0.001). Furthermore, phage-DAP-AMP and phage-DAP-CPT prevented the emergence of DAP and phage resistance. With HOU503, the combination of phage-DAP-AMP showed the best killing effect, followed closely by phage-DAP-CPT; both showed bactericidal and synergistic effects compared to any single agent (ANOVA range of mean differences 3.99 to 4.08 log10 CFU/mL; p < 0.001).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944492PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compared single
8
single agent
8
agent anova
8
anova range
8
range differences
8
log10 cfu/ml
8
cfu/ml 0001
8
evaluation bacteriophage-antibiotic
4
bacteriophage-antibiotic combination
4
combination therapy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!