A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftriaxone, Ertapenem, Fosfomycin and Gentamicin in . | LitMetric

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftriaxone, Ertapenem, Fosfomycin and Gentamicin in .

Antibiotics (Basel)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: February 2022

Objectives: To assess the in vitro effect of select antimicrobials on the growth of and its pharmacodynamic parameters.

Methods: Time-kill assays were performed on two reference strains (ceftriaxone-resistant WHO X and ceftriaxone-susceptible WHO F) and one clinical strain (ceftriaxone-susceptible CS03307). Time-kill curves were constructed for each strain by measuring bacterial growth rates at doubling antimicrobial concentrations of ceftriaxone, ertapenem, fosfomycin and gentamicin. Inputs from these curves were used to estimate minimal bacterial growth rates at high antimicrobial concentrations (), maximum bacterial growth rates in the absence of antimicrobials (), pharmacodynamic minimum inhibitory concentrations (zMIC), and Hill's coefficients (κ).

Results: Ceftriaxone, ertapenem and fosfomycin showed gradual death overtime at higher antimicrobial concentrations with a relatively high , demonstrating time-dependent activity. Compared to WHO F, the for WHO X was significantly increased, reflecting decreased killing activity for ceftriaxone, ertapenem and fosfomycin. At high ceftriaxone concentrations, WHO X was still efficiently killed. CS03307 also showed a high for ceftriaxone in spite of a low MIC and no difference in for fosfomycin in spite of significant MIC and zMIC differences. Gentamicin showed rapid killing for all three strains at high concentrations, demonstrating concentration-dependent activity.

Conclusions: Based on time-kill assays, high-dosage ceftriaxone could be used to treat strains with MIC above breakpoint, with gentamicin as a potential alternative. Whether ertapenem or fosfomycin would be effective to treat strains with a high MIC to ceftriaxone is questionable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944423PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030299DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ertapenem fosfomycin
20
ceftriaxone ertapenem
16
bacterial growth
12
growth rates
12
antimicrobial concentrations
12
fosfomycin gentamicin
8
time-kill assays
8
high ceftriaxone
8
strains high
8
treat strains
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!