Background: Epidural fibrosis (EF) is one of the leading causes of post lumbar surgery syndrome (PLSS). Although there are studies in the literature suggesting that lumbar epidural steroid injections are an effective method in the pain management of PLSS caused by EF, no study is available comparing the effectiveness and safety of caudal and transforaminal approaches.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with PLSS.

Study Design: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind study.

Setting: Interventional pain management center at a tertiary care center.

Methods: Patients with low back and radicular pain related to EF following single-level lumbar discectomy were included. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: a CESI group and a TFESI group. All patients were assessed before the procedure (baseline) and at one hour, 3 weeks, and 3 months after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and at baseline, 3 weeks, and 3 months using the modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI). Treatment success was defined as a >= 50% decrease in the NRS-11 scores compared to baseline.

Results: A total of 56 patients (n = 26 CESI group; n = 30 TFESI group) were included. NRS-11 and mODI scores showed a significant decline in both groups at all follow-ups (P < 0.001). At 3 weeks, the improvement in the mODI scores was significantly higher in the TFESI group (P = 0.020). In all follow-ups, the NRS-11 scores were similar between the groups. At 3 weeks, the rates of patients with a >= 50% decrease in NRS-11 scores were 53.8% and 60% in the CESI group and TFESI group, respectively, while these rates were 30% and 26.7%, respectively, at 3 months.

Limitations: This study had no placebo-control group and a relatively short follow-up.

Conclusion: Both CESI and TFESI are effective and safe methods in the treatment of PLSS caused by EF following lumbar discectomy. These methods can reduce pain and disability. Although both methods have similar treatment success rates, TFESI seems to be a more effective treatment method in reducing disability at 3-week follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epidural steroid
16
tfesi group
16
steroid injection
12
cesi group
12
group tfesi
12
nrs-11 scores
12
versus transforaminal
8
transforaminal epidural
8
post lumbar
8
lumbar surgery
8

Similar Publications

[The place of invasive approaches to the treatment of low back pain].

Rev Med Liege

January 2025

Service de Médecine Physique et Traumatologie du Sport, CHU Liège, Belgique.

The prevalence of chronic low back pain is high and rising. Chronic low back pain is «non-specific» in approximately 90 % of cases. In addition to age, risk factors include smoking, obesity, physical and psychological stress, as well as demographic factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are often used to treat low back pain (LBP) due to lumbosacral radiculopathy as well as LBP without a clear component of radiculopathy, in some cases. While it is increasingly recognized that psychosocial factors are associated with pain outcomes, few studies have assessed the contribution of these factors to common pain interventions like ESIs. This study aimed to summarize the scope and nature of how psychosocial factors are accounted for in research on ESIs for the treatment of LBP with or without lumbosacral radiculopathy and to identify gaps and recommendations for future research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem faced by chronic pain management specialists. Steroid-only epidural injections have modest efficacy because of excessive scarring. Epidural hyaluronidase (HA), functions as a depolymerizing agent, successfully breaking down adhesions and collagen bundles, whereas dexmedetomidine (DEX) helps to reduce inflammation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Epidural steroid injections are frequently used to treat chronic radicular pain of a discogenic origin; however, their efficacy remains limited. Magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine are emerging adjuvants with the potential to enhance the effectiveness and prolong the therapeutic duration of steroid injections.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, 90 patients with unilateral lower limb radiculopathy due to lumbar disc prolapse who did not respond to conservative treatment for 12 weeks were assigned to three groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Physicians worldwide face the challenging task of improving patient satisfaction by reducing pain in injured patients. Currently, available therapeutic approaches provide only short-term relief of symptoms without addressing long-term satisfaction. This has led to exploring regenerative treatment options that can deliver better outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!