Cochlear variability is of key importance for the clinical use of cochlear implants, the most successful neuroprosthetic device that is surgically placed into the cochlear scala tympani. Despite extensive literature on human cochlear variability, few information is available on the variability of the modiolar wall. In the present study, we analyzed 108 corrosion casts, 95 clinical cone beam computer tomographies (CTs) and 15 µCTs of human cochleae and observed modiolar variability of similar and larger extent than the lateral wall variability. Lateral wall measures correlated with modiolar wall measures significantly. ~ 49% of the variability had a common cause. Based on these data we developed a model of the modiolar wall variations and related the model to the design of cochlear implants aimed for perimodiolar locations. The data demonstrate that both the insertion limits relevant for lateral wall damage (approximate range of 4-9 mm) as well as the dimensions required for optimal perimodiolar placement of the electrode (the point of release from the straightener; approximate range of 2-5mm) are highly interindividually variable. The data demonstrate that tip fold-overs of preformed implants likely result from the morphology of the modiolus (with radius changing from base to apex), and that optimal cochlear implantation of perimodiolar arrays cannot be guaranteed without an individualized surgical technique.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943032 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08731-x | DOI Listing |
Otol Neurotol
February 2025
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Hypothesis: The objective of this study is to obtain comprehensive morphometric measurements of the incomplete partition type II (IP-II) cochlea to provide a better understanding of intracochlear anatomy and important considerations for electrode selection and insertion.
Background: IP-II is the most common bony inner ear malformation that often requires cochlear implantation. Currently, there is significant controversy on electrode selection due to a lack of research that can provide reliable, high-resolution measurements.
Sci Rep
November 2024
Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Heliyon
August 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Audiol Neurootol
July 2024
Department of Otolaryngology at ukb, Charité Medical School, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Introduction: Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation remains challenging. There are several approaches to preserve residual hearing, but the configuration of the implant electrode array seems to play a major role. Lateral wall electrode arrays are seemingly more favorable in this context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurol
May 2024
Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Background: Despite its location near infection-prone areas, the human inner ear demonstrates remarkable resilience. This suggests that there are inherent instruments deterring the invasion and spread of pathogens into the inner ear. Here, we combined high-resolution light microscopy, super-resolution immunohistochemistry (SR-SIM) and synchrotron phase contrast imaging (SR-PCI) to identify the protection and barrier systems in the various parts of the human inner ear, focusing on the lateral wall, spiral ganglion, and endolymphatic sac.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!