AI Article Synopsis

  • The CDC's field triage guidelines help emergency services decide how to prioritize care for injured patients, focusing on physiological, anatomical, and special mechanisms of injury.
  • A systematic review conducted from 2011 to 2021 analyzed studies to identify which mechanism and special consideration criteria were best at predicting serious injuries requiring trauma center attention.
  • Key factors strongly predicting serious injuries include situations like death in the vehicle, ejection, lack of seat belt use, high speeds, and falls from heights, while some predictors like vehicle intrusion and age showed minor relevance.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria in the mechanism and special consideration steps that might be predictive of serious injury or need for a trauma center.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the predictive utility of mechanism and special consideration criteria for predicting serious injury. A research librarian searched in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2011 and February 2021. Eligible studies were identified using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they lacked an outcome for serious injury, such as measures of resource use, injury severity scores, mortality, or composite measures using a combination of outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in populations, measures, and outcomes, results were synthesized qualitatively focusing on positive likelihood ratios (LR+) whenever these could be calculated from presented data or adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

Results: We reviewed 2418 abstracts and 315 full-text publications and identified 42 relevant studies. The factors most predictive of serious injury across multiple studies were death in the same vehicle (LR+ 2.2-7.4), ejection (aOR 3.2-266.2), extrication (LR+ 1.1-6.6), lack of seat belt use (aOR 4.4-11.3), high speeds (aOR 2.0-2.9), concerning crash variables identified by vehicle telemetry systems (LR+ 4.7-22.2), falls from height (LR+ 2.4-5.9), and axial load or diving (aOR 2.5-17.6). Minor or inconsistent predictors of serious injury were vehicle intrusion (LR+ 0.8-7.2), cardiopulmonary or neurologic comorbidities (LR+ 0.8-3.1), older age (LR+ 0.6-6.8), or anticoagulant use (LR+ 1.1-1.8).

Conclusions: Select mechanism and special consideration criteria contribute positively to appropriate field triage of potentially injured patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545392PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14489DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serious injury
24
mechanism special
16
special consideration
16
predictive serious
12
lr+
9
systematic review
8
field triage
8
injured patients
8
consideration steps
8
consideration criteria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!