Objectives: To conduct critical assessment of the literature on the effects of cochlear implantation on adults' cognitive abilities.
Design: PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Web of Science, Livivo, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, and grey literature were searched. Eligibility criteria: age 18 or over with severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss, cochlear implantation, cognitive test before and after implantation. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB, ROBINS-I and MASTARI tools. Meta-analysis was performed.
Study Sample: Out of 1830 studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria.
Results: On AlaCog test, significant improvement was found after implantation [MD = -46.64; CI95% = -69.96 to -23.33; = 71%]. No significant differences were found on the Flanker, Recall, Trail A and n-back tests ( > 0.05). For MMSE, no significance was found [MD 0.63; CI 95% = -2.19 to 3.45; = 88%]. On TMT, an overall significant effect with a 9-second decrease in processing speed post-implantation [MD = -9.43; CI95% = -15.42 to -3.44; = 0%].
Conclusion: Cognitive improvements after cochlear implantation may depend on time and the cognitive task evaluated. Well-designed studies with longer follow-up are necessary to examine whether cochlear implantation has a positive influence on cognitive abilities. Development of cognitive assessment tools to hearing-impaired individuals is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2022.2050823 | DOI Listing |
Vestn Otorinolaringol
December 2024
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Unlabelled: The article is devoted to the problem of the rehabilitation stage of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear abnormalities. It provides a detailed analysis of the audiological characteristics of such patients and draws conclusions about approaches to interpreting diagnostic data and speech processors fitting.
Material And Methods: The track records of 80 patients with abnormalities of the inner ear development were retrospectively studied, of which 10 had abnormal structure of the auditory nerve.
Audiol Res
December 2024
Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Background/objectives: Adult hearing-impaired patients qualifying for cochlear implants typically exhibit less than 60% sentence recognition under the best hearing aid conditions, either in quiet or noisy environments, with speech and noise presented through a single speaker. This study examines the influence of deep neural network-based (DNN-based) noise reduction on cochlear implant evaluation.
Methods: Speech perception was assessed using AzBio sentences in both quiet and noisy conditions (multi-talker babble) at 5 and 10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) through one loudspeaker.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
December 2024
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Objective: Clinicians face challenges in managing the growing population of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) and hearing loss (HL) in the United States. This study seeks to investigate provider perspectives on evaluating, counseling, and treating HL in LEP patients.
Study Design: Prospective descriptive study.
PLoS One
December 2024
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cochlear implantation is a well-established method for restoring hearing sensation in individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. It significantly improves verbal communication for many users, despite substantial variability in patients' reports and performance on speech perception tests and quality-of-life outcome measures. Such variability in outcome measures remains several years after implantation and could reflect difficulties in attentional regulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
December 2024
University of Utah, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, United States. Electronic address:
Introduction: Pediatric temporal bone fractures (TBFs) can result in adverse outcomes including meningitis, significant sensorineural hearing loss requiring cochlear implantation (CI), facial nerve weakness, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and labyrinthitis. The objective of this study is to determine the risks of these outcomes for TBFs with hearing loss.
Methods: Using the multinational TriNetX database, a retrospective cohort study was performed of patients less than 18 years old with diagnostic codes for other fracture of base of skull and hearing loss to serve as an approximation of TBF.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!