Objective: Amidst growing numbers of women in certain areas of medicine (eg, general practice/primary care), yet their continued under-representation in others (eg, surgical specialties), this study examines (1) whether medical professionals mistakenly infer that women are now broadly well represented, overestimating women's representation in several different areas and roles; and (2) whether this overestimation of women's representation predicts decreased support for gender equality initiatives in the field, in conjunction with one's own gender.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: UK-based medical field.

Participants: 425 UK medical consultants/general practitioners and trainees (ST/CT1+/SHO/Registrar); 47% were female.

Main Outcome Measures: Estimates of women's representation in different areas/roles within medicine, examined as a composite estimate and individually; and a multi-item measure of support for gender-based initiatives in medicine.

Results: Medical professionals tended to overestimate women's true representation in several different areas of medicine (general practice, medical specialties, surgical specialties) and in various roles (consultants/general practitioners, trainees, medical school graduates). Moreover, these erroneous estimates predicted a decreased willingness to support gender-based initiatives, particularly among men in the field: composite overestimation*respondent gender interaction, =-0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01, p=0.01. Specifically, while female respondents' (over)estimates were unrelated to their level of support (=0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02, p=0.92), male respondents' tendency to overestimate the proportion of women in medicine predicted lower support for gender-based initiatives (=-0.04, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.02, p<0.001).

Conclusions: While some progress has been made in gender representation in the medical field, this research illustrates that there are still barriers to gender equality efforts and identifies who within the field is focally maintaining these barriers. It is those individuals (particularly men) who overestimate the progress that has been made in women's representation who are at highest risk of undermining it.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943774PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054769DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

women's representation
16
support gender-based
12
gender-based initiatives
12
overestimating women's
8
support gender
8
gender equality
8
equality initiatives
8
areas medicine
8
medicine general
8
surgical specialties
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Breast cancer stands as the most prevalent form of cancer among women globally. This heterogeneous disease exhibits varying clinical behaviors. The stratification of breast cancer patients into risk groups, determined by their metastasis and survival outcomes, is pivotal for tailoring personalized treatments and therapeutic interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mortality data systems are upstream determinants of health, providing critical information on causes of death and population health trends and influencing health outcomes by shaping policies, research, and resource allocation. Moreover, the gender-related deaths of women and girls are significantly underrepresented or underrecognized in mortality data across many countries. This paper seeks to identify potential barriers and facilitators to improving the representation of femicide data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Women-identifying and women+ gender faculty (hereto described as women+ faculty) face numerous barriers to career advancement in medicine and biomedical sciences. Despite accumulating evidence that career development programming for women+ is critical for professional advancement and well-being, accessibility of these programs is generally limited to small cohorts, only offered to specific disciplines, or otherwise entirely unavailable. Opportunities for additional, targeted career development activities are imperative in developing and retaining women+ faculty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The COVID-19 pandemic may have exacerbated mental health conditions by introducing and/or modifying stressors, particularly in university populations. We examined longitudinal patterns, time-varying predictors, and contemporaneous correlates of moderate-severe psychological distress (MS-PD) among college students. During 2020-2021, participants completed self-administered questionnaires quarterly (T1 = 562, T2 = 334, T3 = 221, and T4 = 169).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ARCH: Large-scale knowledge graph via aggregated narrative codified health records analysis.

J Biomed Inform

January 2025

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, 02115, MA, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S Huntington Ave, Boston, 02130, MA, USA. Electronic address:

Objective: Electronic health record (EHR) systems contain a wealth of clinical data stored as both codified data and free-text narrative notes (NLP). The complexity of EHR presents challenges in feature representation, information extraction, and uncertainty quantification. To address these challenges, we proposed an efficient Aggregated naRrative Codified Health (ARCH) records analysis to generate a large-scale knowledge graph (KG) for a comprehensive set of EHR codified and narrative features.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!