Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment of renal stone >2 cm. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) had emerged in the past decade as a new technique in treating renal stones <2 cm. In this study we compared between the outcome of UMP in prone position with the outcome of UMP in modified flank free supine position (FFSP). A prospective randomized study was conducted between January 2016 and April 2020, including 122 patients, divided into two matched groups. Group A included 61 patients who underwent UMP in FFSP, and Group B included 61 patients who underwent UMP in a prone position. All patients had a single renal pelvic stone 1-2 cm. Patients with a single kidney, renal anomalies, body mass index ≥40 kg/m, history of ipsilateral renal surgery, and age <18 years were excluded. In both groups, the dilatation was done up to 13F; a holmium laser was used through a 9F ureteroscope for fragmentation. Nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent were used only when indicated. In total, 122 patients were divided into two groups. The mean age was 40.09 ± 13.63 and 39.67 ± 13.80 years in both groups, respectively. The operative time was 63.64 ± 9.22 and 78.48 ± 9.55 minutes in Groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.0001). The fluoroscopy time was 3.47 ± 0.56 and 4.45 ± 0.39 minutes in Groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.0001). No significant difference was shown between both groups regarding operative and postoperative complications. Shift to mini-PCNL was needed in one patient in Group A and four patients in Group B because of impaired vision. The hospital stay was 25.36 ± 4.23 and 26.13 ± 4.76 hours in both groups, respectively. The initial stone-free rate was 95.1% and 91.8% in both groups, respectively. UMP in modified supine position shows comparable results with UMP in the prone position regarding stone-free rate, hospital stay, and perioperative complication, with significantly shorter operative and fluoroscopy time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0016 | DOI Listing |
Arch Esp Urol
November 2024
Department of Urology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 05355 Seoul, Korea.
World J Urol
June 2024
Department of Science and Education, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) and Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal/upper ureteral calculi in 1.0-2.0 cm diameter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrol J
June 2024
Department of Urology, Endourology and Stone Unit, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone extensive modification to reduce complications. One of the recent advances in minimally invasive procedures is the advent of ultra-mini PCNL (UM-PCNL), which provides miniaturized access to the kidney. However, the specific instruments applied in UM-PCNL may not be found in centers with limited resources.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Surg Int
February 2024
Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Objective: In this study, we aimed to contribute to the literature by sharing the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of infants (0-24 months) who underwent ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for kidney stones in our clinic.
Methods: Infants under 24 months old with kidney stones of 2 cm and larger, who applied to our clinic between January 2018 and May 2023, were included in the study. The patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from the medical records.
Arab J Urol
May 2023
Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare results, safety and outcome of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus stented shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for the management of renal calculi sized 10-20 mm.
Methods: This study was conducted at Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University. After meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, 90 patients were randomized to either ultra-mini-PCNL group or stented SWL group through the closed-envelope technique, with 45 patients in each group.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!