AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to identify prognostic factors and create a model for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who underwent upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) while treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).
  • - A total of 211 mRCC patients were analyzed, with 117 undergoing upfront CN and 94 receiving initial systemic therapy; the study found that the upfront CN group had significantly better overall survival and various favorable characteristics compared to the non-upfront CN group.
  • - Factors such as multiple metastatic organs and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) below 80% were identified as independent predictors of overall survival, with the

Article Abstract

Introduction And Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors and to establish a prognostic model using them for upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Materials And Methods: Two hundred eleven patients who were diagnosed as mRCC at initial diagnosis and were treated with TKI and/or ICI were classified into 2 groups: those undergoing CN (upfront CN group, 117 cases) and those who initially underwent systemic therapy (non-upfront CN group, 94 cases). In the upfront CN group, the patients' background and overall survival (OS) were compared with those in the other two groups, and prognostic factors were analyzed. A prognostic model of the upfront CN group was established.

Results: The median of the observation period for the upfront CN group was 25 months. The rates of patients with clear cell histology, with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of ≥ 80%, with a single metastatic organ, with a normal pretreated C-reactive protein level, and with an intermediate risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model were significantly higher than those in the non-upfront CN group (87.2% and 30.9%, p < 0.0001; 92.3% and 77.7%, p = 0.0025; 41.9% and 24.5%, p = 0.0080; 47.9% and 13.8%, p < 0.0001; 66.7% and 45.7%, p = 0.0023, respectively). The 50% OS in the upfront CN group was 33.1 months, significantly better than that in the non-upfront CN group (11.1 months, p < 0.0001), and these results were consistent regardless of their prognostic risk level. Multivariate analysis showed that multiple metastatic organs and a KPS of < 80% were independent predictive factors for OS (hazard ratio: 1.653 and 2.995, p = 0.0339 and 0.0054, respectively). Using these two parameters to stratify the upfront CN group, the 50% OSs in cases with no risk factors, in those with one factor, and in those with two factors were 43.4 months, 29.1 months, and 7.7 months, respectively (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The upfront CN group was able to be stratified by our prognostic model into three subgroups with different prognoses. This model can provide useful information for making decisions in consideration of upfront CN in patients with mRCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03157-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upfront group
16
prognostic model
12
model upfront
12
upfront cytoreductive
8
cytoreductive nephrectomy
8
nephrectomy patients
8
patients metastatic
8
metastatic renal
8
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8

Similar Publications

Background: Upfront 2-stent techniques are often used in bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but there is controversy about optimal strategy selection.

Methods: The authors examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of 232 bifurcation PCIs that were performed using the double kissing (DK) crush or culotte technique in 216 patients between 2014 and 2023 using data from the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Bifurcation Lesion Interventions (NCT05100992). The inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess long-term outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The benefits of neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer have been well established by multiple trials. However, there may be socioeconomic barriers impacting equitable administration. We aim to identify whether disparities exist in uptake of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with loco-regional oesophageal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify the most effective treatment modality for achieving favorable outcomes in early glottic tumors with anterior commissure involvement (ACI).

Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.

Review Methods: Random-effects proportional meta-analysis model is used to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) versus radiation therapy (RT) in early glottic (T1-T2) cancer with ACI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Local excision (LE) for T1 rectal cancer may be recommended in those with low-risk disease, while resection is typically recommended in those with a high risk of luminal recurrence or lymph node metastasis. The aim of this work was to compare survival between resection and LE.

Method: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study set in the Canadian province of Ontario.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!