AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored the effectiveness of ultrasonic bone osteotome (UBS) compared to traditional high-speed drill (HSD) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgeries by analyzing data from 97 patients.
  • The results indicated that the UBS group experienced less intraoperative blood loss, shorter decompression times, and fewer complications compared to the HSD group.
  • Both groups showed significant improvement in Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores post-surgery, but there was no notable difference in clinical outcomes between the groups at follow-up.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the application skills and importance of ultrasonic bone osteotome in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery.

Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2020, the data of 97 patients who underwent anterior cervical disc resection and fusion (ACDF) in our hospital were collected and retrospectively analyzed. According to the main instruments for decompression of the intervertebral space, we divided the 97 patients into ultrasonic bone osteotome (UBS) group and traditional high-speed drill (HSD) group. The intraoperative indexes selected for comparison between the 2 groups were intervertebral space decompression time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence and types of complications within the 2 groups of patients, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA improvement rates of the 2 groups of patients before and after surgery.

Results: There was no statistical difference in general data such as age, sex, duration of symptoms, and surgical segment between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Intervertebral decompression time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications in the UBS group were less than those in the HSD group (P < 0.05). The JOA scores of the 2 groups of patients were significantly improved after the operation compared with scores from before the operation, with results being statistically significant (P < 0.05), however, there was no difference in clinical effect between the 2 groups at each follow-up time point (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: This study shows that in ACDF surgery, UBS is more efficient than HSD and can effectively shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of bleeding and the incidence of complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasonic bone
12
bone osteotome
12
anterior cervical
12
groups patients
12
osteotome anterior
8
cervical disc
8
disc resection
8
resection fusion
8
intervertebral space
8
ubs group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!