Background: Since 2013, badger culling has been part of the UK Government's strategy for controlling bovine tuberculosis (bTB) within a high-risk area (HRA) in England. Government surveillance data now enables an examination of bTB herd incidence and prevalence, its headline indicators, within and outside cull areas over the period 2009-2020.
Methods: Analysis compared herd incidence and prevalence data from within and outside badger culling areas. A range of models (GLMs, GLMMs, GAMs and GAMMs) were used to analyse incidence and prevalence in culled and unculled areas using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Change in incidence across ten county areas within the HRA for the period 2010-2020 was also compared.
Results: Analyses based on Defra published data using a variety of statistical methodologies did not suggest that badger culling affected herd bTB incidence or prevalence over the study period. In 9 of 10 counties, bTB incidence peaked and began to fall before badger culling commenced.
Limitations: There are limitations around the data available on culling location, temporal information and other confounding factors. As such, further analysis of any future datasets that may be released on bTB levels in areas where badger culling has been implemented is warranted.
Conclusion: This examination of government data obtained over a wide area and a long time period failed to identify a meaningful effect of badger culling on bTB in English cattle herds. These findings may have implications for the use of badger culling in current and future bTB control policy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1384 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Evaluating the effectiveness of badger vaccination combined with cattle test-and-removal in managing Bovine Tuberculosis: Insights from a two-host and multi-route transmission model.
Prev Vet Med
November 2024
Quantitative Veterinary Epidemiology group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, the Netherlands; Biometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, the Netherlands.
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) has a complex infection ecology and is difficult to control in many countries, including Ireland. For many years, the Irish national bTB eradication programme relied on cattle-based control measures, including test-and-removal with related movement restrictions. In the early 2000s, badger culling was added as a part of the control measure in the national programme.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRandomised Badger Culling Trial lacks evidence for proactive badger culling effect on tuberculosis in cattle: comment on Mills et al. 2024, Parts I & II.
bioRxiv
September 2024
Herpetofauna Consultants International, Suffolk, UK.
Article Synopsis
- The rebuttal by Mills et al. (2024) defends the statistical methods used in the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), particularly the choice of count over rate for assessing bovine tuberculosis herd incidence.
- * The authors argue that previous analyses overfit data and incorrectly apply Bayesian methods, prioritizing model fit over practical predictive power in a small dataset context.
- * Ultimately, the RBCT's findings on the impact of badger culling on bovine tuberculosis incidence are deemed unconvincing, with modern veterinary insights suggesting the original conclusions still stand but require a nuanced understanding.
An extensive re-evaluation of evidence and analyses of the Randomised Badger Culling Trial II: In neighbouring areas.
R Soc Open Sci
August 2024
Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
In the second investigation in a pair of analyses which re-evaluates the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT), we estimate the effects of proactive badger culling on the incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in cattle populations in unculled neighbouring areas. Throughout peer-reviewed analyses of the RBCT, proactive culling was estimated to have detrimental effects on the incidence of herd breakdowns (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn extensive re-evaluation of evidence and analyses of the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) I: Within proactive culling areas.
R Soc Open Sci
August 2024
Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Here, in the first of two investigations, we evaluate and extend the analyses of the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) to estimate the effectiveness of proactive badger culling for reducing incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in cattle within culling areas. Using previously reviewed, publicly available data, alongside frequentist and Bayesian approaches, we re-estimate culling effects for confirmed incidence of herd breakdowns (TB incidents in cattle) within proactive culling areas. We appraise the varying assumptions and statistical structures of individual models to determine model appropriateness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicrobiological and decomposition analysis of mass mink burial sites during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sci Rep
August 2024
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 15, 1870, Frederiksberg C., Denmark.
In 2020, Denmark buried approximately four million culled, farmed mink in mass graves treated with slaked lime due to widespread SARS-CoV-2 infections. After six months, environmental concerns prompted the exhumation of these cadavers. Our analysis encompassed visual inspections, soil pH measurements, and gas emission assessments of the grave environment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!