A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Left hemothorax resulting from delayed right ventricular apical pacing lead perforation without hemopericardium, a case report. | LitMetric

Left hemothorax resulting from delayed right ventricular apical pacing lead perforation without hemopericardium, a case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America; Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America. Electronic address:

Published: April 2022

Introduction And Importance: Right ventricular pacemaker lead perforation is a rare but well documented complication of pacemaker implantation. Lead perforation can cause an array of symptoms ranging from none to hemodynamic instability and tamponade. In previously reported cases, lead perforation has always been able to be confirmed by imaging, with computed tomography (CT) scan considered to be the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality.

Case Presentation: An 80-year-old male underwent uncomplicated implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome as an outpatient. Thirty-nine days later, the patient presented to the emergency department complaining of new-onset, left-sided, pleuritic chest pain. He was found to have unilateral hemothorax and abnormal pacemaker lead interrogation. Pacemaker lead perforation was suspected but not confirmed with imaging. Lead perforation was only identified after surgical exploration.

Clinical Discussion: This patient had multiple risk factors for pacemaker lead perforation. However, imaging, including CT scan was unable to confirm perforation. The presence of an otherwise unexplained left hemothorax strongly suggested that surgical intervention was indicated. The lead perforation was subsequently confirmed with subxiphoid exploration of the pericardial space. The mechanism of lead perforation resulting in hemothorax in this case is not straight forward, as no direct communication between the pericardial and pleural spaces was identified. However, previously described visceral pericardial self-sealing may contribute to the small pericardial accumulation described herein.

Conclusion: This patient's presentation and clinical course underscore the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for pacemaker lead perforation despite a lack of confirmation with imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924622PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lead perforation
40
pacemaker lead
20
lead
11
perforation
11
left hemothorax
8
confirmed imaging
8
pacemaker
7
imaging
5
hemothorax delayed
4
delayed ventricular
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!