AI Article Synopsis

  • Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is hard to diagnose, especially in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) but who show heart failure symptoms.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of diastolic stress echocardiography (DSE) and specific heart failure biomarkers in diagnosing DD in these patients, involving 80 participants with various health backgrounds.
  • Results showed that DSE identified DD in 21% of patients, and certain factors like age and resting NT-proBNP levels helped predict positive DSE outcomes, enhancing the overall diagnostic capabilities of echocardiography.

Article Abstract

Background: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is a diagnostic challenge in clinical practice.

Aim: Our study aimed to evaluate the value of diastolic stress echocardiography (DSE) and heart failure (HF) biomarkers in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and HF symptoms.

Methods: All the consecutive patients with HF symptoms, preserved LVEF, and suspected DD were examined on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and DSE using the protocol according to the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations. Moreover, blood samples were taken 30 minutes before and after DSE for the following lab markers: N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and serum soluble ST2 receptor (ST2).

Results: The study group included 80 patients (mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 69 (8.1) years; 25% males) with dyspnea (New York Heart Association classification IIa - 53; IIb - 17; III - 10) and risk factors: hypertension (96%), diabetes (41%), obesity (56%), and known coronary artery disease (10%). The rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed preserved systolic function (mean [SD], LVEF 61.1 [10.5]%) and normal or indeterminate diastolic function. DSE revealed a positive result for diastolic dysfunction in 17 patients (21%). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that age (the area under the curve [AUC], 0.725; P < 0.01), left atrial volume indexed for body surface area [LAVI] rest (AUC, 0.722; P < 0.01), E/e' rest (AUC, 0.790; P < 0.01), and baseline NT-proBNP (AUC, 0.713; P < 0.01) predicted positive DSE. Other parameters, including body mass index, baseline E/A, DT, or e' were not predictive of DSE results.

Conclusions: DSE revealed diastolic dysfunction in 21% of study patients and improved the diagnostic value of echocardiography. Rest NT-proBNP, but not MR-proANP and ST2, provided a diagnostic value for diastolic dysfunction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.33963/KP.a2022.0070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diastolic dysfunction
16
diastolic stress
8
stress echocardiography
8
biomarkers patients
8
patients preserved
8
preserved left
8
ejection fraction
8
heart failure
8
transthoracic echocardiography
8
echocardiography tte
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!