Background And Objectives: References for medical articles are not always retrievable. This eliminates the ability to check on the validity of statements, methodologies, data collection, and conclusions.

Methods: References of review, scientific, and research articles published in the 2019 and 2020 were evaluated for ability to retrieve the reference cited.

Results: Ninety-five articles with 2,424 references were evaluated. There were 1,025 (1,025/2,424 = 42.3%) open access versus 1,399 (1,399/2,424 = 47.7%) paywall articles. There were 357 (14.7%) citations unavailable (misreference) due to bad, broken, or nonexistent links and wrong article, abstract or citation only, and missing citations.

Conclusion: Loss of reference existence or retrievability is a scientific hazard. Science is self-correcting but is doomed to not knowing what was said or discovered when references are no longer available.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896816PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reference hygiene
4
hygiene death
4
death internet
4
internet decay
4
decay rot
4
rot half-life
4
half-life deterioration
4
deterioration corruption
4
corruption background
4
background objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!