Background: In terms of missions, hospitals are divided into teaching and nonteaching. In addition, differences in health-care systems in countries will lead to differences in hospitals' operation. Iran, as a specific health-care system, is different from other countries. Hence, the present study investigated differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals and their differences in Iran and the world.

Materials And Methods: A concurrent mixed-methods study was conducted in two stages. The first stage was a narrative review of studies (2000-2020). Using narrative inquiry and reflective analysis, the content was analyzed and the categories were extracted. The second stage was a qualitative study conducted using semi-structured interviews with forty Iranian hospital managers and policymakers through a purposive sampling in 2020. Content analysis was made using deductive approach, and MAXQDA 12 was used for data analysis.

Results: According to the first stage, categories were extracted as follows: service quality, type of cases, patient satisfaction, efficiency, performance indicators, patient safety, personnel, use of drugs, access to services, technologies, justice in the type of services received, using guidelines, processes, and number of services. In the second stage, 8 main categories, 17 categories, and 45 subcategories were extracted. The extracted main categories were as follows: mission and target, management and behavioral organizations, supply chain and chain of results, human resources, costs and budget, policy demands, clients' satisfaction and patients' right, and integration of medical education.

Conclusion: Unlike other countries, in Iran, the combination of missions and the complete dependence of teaching hospitals on the government has caused differences. Reducing the treatment mission of teaching hospitals; differences in the budget and development of its indicators; lower tariffs for teaching hospitals; developing a cost-income management model and supply chain; preventing uncertainty other than medical students except medicine; considering the clients' right to choose hospital; and organizing research missions in hospitals were the solutions for decrease differences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893075PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1431_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

teaching nonteaching
12
teaching hospitals
12
differences
8
nonteaching hospitals
8
concurrent mixed-methods
8
mixed-methods study
8
missions hospitals
8
hospitals differences
8
study conducted
8
categories extracted
8

Similar Publications

Background: The July effect in US teaching hospitals has been studied with conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate the effect of physician turnover in July on the clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with cirrhosis.

Methods: We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2016-2019) to identify patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and liver-related complications (variceal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome, acute-on-chronic liver failure).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Goal: This study aimed to compare the value of tax exemptions and community benefits across various nonprofit hospitals and show how hospital and geographical characteristics can explain the values.

Methods: Data from 2017 to 2021 Internal Revenue Service Form 990s were used to evaluate 17 types of community benefits in nonprofit hospitals and assess six categories of tax benefits. Descriptive analyses compared charity care, community benefits, and estimated tax exemptions among nonprofit hospitals while considering variations in teaching status, location (rurality), and US region.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer resection is common and highly morbid. Extended pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after cancer surgery lowers venous thromboembolism risk and is recommended by major professional societies. Adherence is low in contemporary local and regional studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate individual-, hospital-, and community-level factors associated with sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) among infants born preterm.

Study Design: The following linked dataset from 5 states (California, Michigan, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina) from 2005 through 2020 was used: (1) infant birth and death certificates; (2) maternal and infant birth hospitalization discharge records; (3) birthing hospital data from the American Hospital Association; and (4) community-level data from the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).) Multivariable models were used to assess the independent association between these multilevel factors and SUID, adjusting for several maternal and infant characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The goal of natural childbirth care is to have a healthy mother and baby with minimal interventions that are contrary to health. Worldwide, there is concern that non-evidence-based interventions and care in labor and childbirth will remain standard practice. Therefore, access to care related to pregnancy and childbirth is considered a priority.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!