Background: It is important to assess the nutritional status of patients who have experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after chemotherapy. We aimed to explore the nutritional status of patients who developed ADRs after chemotherapy, using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) tool, the Onodera Prognostic Nutrition Index (OPNI), and their combined application.

Methods: NRS 2002 screening and OPNI calculation for patients before chemotherapy. Patients with ADRs after chemotherapy were grouped according to the NRS 2002, OPNI, and combined scores from both assessments. The types of ADRs were classified according to the National adverse drug reaction monitoring system (http://www.adrs.org.cn/). The impact of nutritional risk on the classification and types of ADRs in cancer chemotherapy patients was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the key influencing factors of gastrointestinal damage and bone marrow suppression. the consistency between the NRS 2002, OPNI, and their combined application analyzed.

Results: The difference in body mass index (BMI) scores between the OPNI (P=0.041) and NRS 2002 groups was statistically significant (P=0.051). The difference in ADR type in the OPNI subgroups (P=0.04) was statistically significant. It showed that the proportion of new and severe ADRs in the low OPNI group (47.14%) was significantly higher than that in the high OPNI group (27.13%). The differences in digestive tract-associated ADRs were statistically significant among the OPNI groups (P=0.004), NRS 2002 groups (P=0.012), and combined measures groups (P=0.000), as were the differences in myelosuppressive-type ADRs in the OPNI groups (P=0.035), NRS 2002 groups (P=0.000), and combined measures groups (P=0.000). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI was the key influencing factor for digestive tract-associated ADRs (95% CI: 1.267, 95% CI: 1.022-1.570, P=0.031) and myelosuppressive-type ADRs (95% CI: 1.213, 95% CI: 1.020-1.443, P=0.029). It had good consistency with the combined measures of nutritional risk (Kappa value =0.675).

Conclusions: Patients with severe ADRs after chemotherapy showed low OPNI values, high NRS 2002 scores, and malnutrition. These patients also had a significantly increased incidence of digestive tract and myelosuppressive-type ADRs with BMI as the key influencing factor. The combined assessments showed good consistency with the NRS 2002 scores.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908172PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nrs 2002
40
opni combined
16
adrs chemotherapy
16
opni
12
2002 opni
12
adverse drug
12
adrs
12
nutritional risk
12
key influencing
12
2002 groups
12

Similar Publications

To demonstrate the prevalence of malnutrition risk in a specific rehabilitation setting. The secondary aim of the study was to compare Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) with Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002). Patients diagnosed with stroke, anoxic brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, neuromuscular diseases, Parkinson's disease, and lymphedema who were admitted to a rehabilitation hospital were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognostic evaluation of nutrition risk screening tools in hospitalized adults with normal weight range, overweight, or obesity: A comparative analysis.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr

January 2025

Department of Nutrition, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Background: Many nutrition risk screening tools include low body mass index (BMI). It remains uncertain whether it affects the validity of these tools in patients with overweight or obesity. We aimed to determine the frequency of malnutrition risk and evaluate its association with hospital length of stay in hospitalized adults according to BMI classification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although malnutrition is associated with poor prognosis in Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) patients, no nutrition-based prediction model has been established for PTB. Herein, we explored the clinical utility of common nutrition scores in predicting the prognosis of PTB patients.

Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical baseline data from 167 patients with secondary PTB who had not previously received anti-TB treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients often receive consecutive intensive chemotherapy, which can lead to gastrointestinal complications and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), placing patients at high nutritional risk.

Aim: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the benefits of nutritional support in maintaining nutritional status, reducing weight loss without increasing the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) or liver dysfunction, and improving clinical outcomes in HSCT patients at high nutritional risk.

Methods: A total of 526 patients who underwent HSCT were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To investigate the effect of postoperative supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) containing varying energy intake levels during the early postoperative period on the clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.

Methods: Data from 237 patients, who were diagnosed with gastric cancer between January 2016 and June 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on mean daily SPN energy intake: low (L-SPN; < 20 kcal/kg/day); and high (H-SPN; ≥ 20 kcal/kg/day).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!