A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Potential of pre-interventional magnetic resonance angiography for optimization of workflow and clinical outcome of prostatic arterial embolization. | LitMetric

Potential of pre-interventional magnetic resonance angiography for optimization of workflow and clinical outcome of prostatic arterial embolization.

Eur J Radiol

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany; Division of Experimental Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: May 2022

Purpose: Impact of pre-interventional magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) on prostatic artery embolization (PAE) regarding workflow, radiation dose, and clinical outcome.

Method: Retrospective evaluation of 259 patients (mean age 68 ± 9, range 41-92) with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) undergoing PAE between January 2017 and December 2020. MRA was performed in 137 cases. In 122 patients, no pre-interventional MRA was performed. Origin of the PA, volumetry of the prostatic gland and ADC values were evaluated. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were evaluated before and after PAE.

Results: Origin of the PA was identified in all cases. Significant differences regarding volume reduction (-20 ± 13 ml with MRA vs -17 ± 9 ml without MRA) and ADC value reduction were found (-78 ± 111 10 mm/s with MRA vs -45 ± 99 10 mm/s without MRA). PAE workflow was modified in 16 patients due to MRA findings. Radiation dose (5518.54 ± 6677.97 µGym with MRA vs 23963.50 ± 19792.25 µGym without MRA) and fluoroscopy times (19.35 ± 9.01 min. with MRA vs 27.45 ± 12.54 min. without MRA) significantly differed. IPSS reduction improved (-11 ± 8 points with MRA vs -7 ± 9 points without MRA, p < 0.001), while QOL (-2 ± 1 points with MRA and -2 ± 2 points without MRA) and IIEF (+2 ± 10 points with MRA and +1 ± 11 points without MRA) showed no significant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Pre-interventional MRA facilitates improved workflow and patient safety of PAE while reducing radiation dose and intervention time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110236DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mra
15
radiation dose
12
pre-interventional magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance angiography
8
pae workflow
8
mra performed
8
pre-interventional mra
8
mm/s mra
8
µgym mra
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!