A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China. | LitMetric

Background: An optimal risk-scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non-parametric methods for average-risk populations.

Methods: Screening data of 807,695 subjects and 2806 detected cases in the first-round CRC screening program in Shanghai were used to develop risk-predictive models and scoring systems using logistic-regression (LR) and artificial-neural-network (ANN) methods. Performance of established scoring systems was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, number of high-risk individuals and potential detection rates of CRC.

Results: Age, sex, CRC in first-degree relatives, chronic diarrhoea, mucus or bloody stool, history of any cancer and faecal-immunochemical-test (FIT) results were identified as predictors for the presence of CRC. The AUC of LR-based system was 0.642 when using risk factors only in derivation set, and increased to 0.774 by further incorporating one-sample FIT results, and to 0.808 by including two-sample FIT results, while those for ANN-based systems were 0.639, 0.763 and 0.805, respectively. Better calibrations were observed for the LR-based systems than the ANN-based ones. Compared with the currently used initial tests, parallel use of FIT with LR-based systems resulted in improved specificities, less demands for colonoscopy and higher detection rates of CRC, while parallel use of FIT with ANN-based systems had higher sensitivities; incorporating FIT in the scoring systems further increased specificities, decreased colonoscopy demands and improved detection rates of CRC.

Conclusions: Our results indicate the potentials of LR-based scoring systems incorporating one- or two-sample FIT results for CRC mass screening. External validation is warranted for scaling-up implementation in the Chinese population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089226PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoring systems
24
detection rates
12
systems
10
colorectal cancer
8
crc screening
8
two-sample fit
8
fit ann-based
8
ann-based systems
8
lr-based systems
8
parallel fit
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!