AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers aim to develop a biomarker for assessing the impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cortical activity beyond just the motor cortex.
  • The study evaluated TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) after applying 1 Hz rTMS and included controls for baseline amplitude and comparisons to sham stimulation groups.
  • Results indicated a reduction in the P60 peak and a potential increase in the N100 peak in the active rTMS group, suggesting rTMS may alter brain excitability; however, responses varied widely among individuals, complicating interpretations.

Article Abstract

The impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cortex varies with stimulation parameters, so it would be useful to develop a biomarker to rapidly judge effects on cortical activity, including regions other than motor cortex. This study evaluated rTMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) after 1 Hz of motor cortex stimulation. New features are controls for baseline amplitude and comparison to control groups of sham stimulation. We delivered 200 test pulses at 0.20 Hz before and after 1500 treatment pulses at 1 Hz. Sequences comprised AAA = active stimulation with the same coil for test-treat-test phases ( = 22); PPP = realistic placebo coil stimulation for all three phases ( = 10); and APA = active coil stimulation for tests and placebo coil stimulation for treatment ( = 15). Signal processing displayed the evoked EEG waveforms, and peaks were measured by software. ANCOVA was used to measure differences in TEP peak amplitudes in post-rTMS trials while controlling for pre-rTMS TEP peak amplitude. Post hoc analysis showed reduced P60 amplitude in the active (AAA) rTMS group versus the placebo (APA) group. The N100 peak showed a treatment effect compared to the placebo groups, but no pairwise post hoc differences. N40 showed a trend toward increase. Changes were seen in widespread EEG leads, mostly ipsilaterally. TMS-evoked EEG potentials showed reduction of the P60 peak and increase of the N100 peak, both possibly reflecting increased slow inhibition after 1 Hz of rTMS. TMS-EEG may be a useful biomarker to assay brain excitability at a seizure focus and elsewhere, but individual responses are highly variable, and the difficulty of distinguishing merged peaks complicates interpretation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915089PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051762DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coil stimulation
12
stimulation
9
eeg evoked
8
evoked potentials
8
magnetic stimulation
8
motor cortex
8
eeg potentials
8
placebo coil
8
tep peak
8
post hoc
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!