A critical health literacy (CHL) approach is recommended for promoting health in the school context. This construct is complex and includes three interconnected domains: (A) appraisal of critical information, (B) awareness of the social determinants of health (SDH), and (C) collective action to promote health and well-being. In recent literature reviews, no measurement instrument that covers all three domains of CHL in the school-context was found. Our aim was to develop self-reported measurement scales for each domain of CHL. The development process reported in this study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, an initial item pool was generated based on literature reviews and focus group interviews (N = 15) with adolescents (steps 1-2). In the next steps, items were adjusted and removed based on the feedback from an expert panel and from representatives from the target group (steps 3-5). In stage two, we aimed to reduce the number of items and develop scales for each domain. We then piloted the current draft, which consists of 28 items (N = 114). A sub-sample (N = 10) of the participants were interviewed after they completed the survey to examine the instrument's face validity. Cronbach's α was used to assess the internal reliability of the scales; the reliability was promising for scales A (α = 0.83) and C (α = 0.85) but was below the recommended value for scale B (α = 0.61). The model fit indices were promising (TLI = 0.97, RSMEA = 0.055, TLI = 1.05, RMSEA = 0.00, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.074). The piloted version of scales A and C were positively correlated with subjective health literacy, health-related quality of life, and subjective health; however, we found no such correlations for scale B. The post-survey group interviews led to some adjustments in scales A and B. The revised version of CHLA-Q must be tested using a larger sample; this will enable more robust statistical testing of the properties of the items and the scale.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910382PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health literacy
12
critical health
8
literature reviews
8
scales domain
8
group interviews
8
subjective health
8
health
7
scales
6
developing indicators
4
indicators measure
4

Similar Publications

Background: Podcasts are an unconventional method of disseminating information through audio to the masses. They are an emerging portable technology and a valuable resource that provides unlimited access for promoting health among participants. Podcasts related to health care have been used as a source of medical education, but there is a dearth of studies on the use of podcasts as a source of health information.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Emergency department encounters include an increasing number of patients with limited English proficiency, yet little is known about the impact of interpreter services on unplanned revisits to the emergency department. This study aims to assess interpreters' utilization and unplanned ED revisits, serving as an indicator of care quality.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of ED visits at an urban academic center between January and April 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To determine the effect of the health literacy levels of caregivers of individuals with T2DM on caregiving activities and supportive behaviours.

Methods: Cross sectional study. The sample for the study comprised of people who provided care for 442 individuals who were diagnosed with diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of performance and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for custom ankle-foot orthosis (AFOs) users.

Materials And Methods: Current AFO users completed two assessments one week apart; new AFO users completed an assessment before device delivery and at one- and two-months post-delivery.

Results: Seventy current and 31 new users consented and provided data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient portal telehealth outreach program to return patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) lost to follow-up (LTFU) for eye care. Patients with DR receiving intravitreal injection (IVI) therapy who were >90 days beyond recommended return were deemed LTFU. Outreach messages were sent via a patient portal, when available, or through the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!