Cranioplasty with freehand-molded polymethylmethacrylate implants is based on decades of experience and is still frequently used in clinical practice. However, data confirming the fracture toughness and standard biomechanical tests are rare. This study aimed to determine the amount of force that could be applied to virtually planned, template-molded, patient-specific implants (n = 10) with an implant thickness of 3 mm, used in the treatment of a temporoparietal skull defect (91.87 cm2), until the implant cracks and finally breaks. Furthermore, the influence of the weight and porosity of the implant on its force resistance was investigated. The primary outcome showed that a high force was required to break the implant (mean and standard deviation 1484.6 ± 167.7 N), and this was very strongly correlated with implant weight (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.97; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were force application at the implant’s first, second, and third crack. Only a moderate correlation could be found between fracture force and the volume of porosities (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.59; p = 0.073). The present study demonstrates that an implant thickness of 3 mm for a temporoparietal skull defect can withstand sufficient force to protect the brain. Greater implant weight and, thus, higher material content increases thickness, resulting in more resistance. Porosities that occur during the described workflow do not seem to reduce resistance. Therefore, precise knowledge of the fracture force of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants provides insight into brain injury prevention and serves as a reference for the virtual design process.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911603 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051970 | DOI Listing |
Int J Implant Dent
January 2025
Lecturer at removable prosthodontic department, Faculty of dental medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Childs Nerv Syst
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, UHC Habib Bourguiba, Sfax, Tunisia.
Cranioplasty to restore calvarial defects involves reconstruction with alloplastic materials or autologous tissues in order to provide the best protection to all intracranial contents. Sometimes, autologous bone may not be available; therefore, different materials have emerged such as polymethylmethacrylate plate, titanium mesh, and hydroxyapatite. However, when it is impossible to replace the autologous bone, the aesthetic result is generally unsatisfactory.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
November 2024
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Salud de Niño - San Borja, Lima, Peru.
Background: Biocompatible computer-assisted design (CAD) implants for cranioplasty are associated with high costs and considerable waiting time. We present the results of the first cranioplasty experience in our country using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with customized 3D molds of the cranial defect.
Methods: We present a case series describing five patients with extensive cranial defects who underwent cranioplasty with PMMA using customized 3D molds.
Biomed Eng Comput Biol
October 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Annapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Cranioplasty is one of the most common neurosurgical procedure performed to repair cranial defect. Many materials and fabrication technique are used to prepare cranial implant in cases where autologous bone is not available. Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) is one of the most common polymer used as bone substitute.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosurg Case Lessons
September 2024
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!