A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Hernia Recurrence in Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) can reduce complications in patients who undergo simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (VHR-PAN), which is known for a high rate of wound issues.
  • - A review of 114 patients showed no significant difference in overall surgical site occurrences between those treated with standard dressings and those receiving ciNPWT; however, the hernia recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (0% vs. 10.5%).
  • - The findings suggest that using ciNPWT may help decrease hernia recurrence after VHR-PAN compared to standard dressings, highlighting the need for more extensive studies to confirm its effectiveness

Article Abstract

Unlabelled: Simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (VHR-PAN) is associated with a high rate of wound complications. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been shown to lower complications in high-risk wounds. There is a debate in the literature as to whether ciNPWT is effective at preventing complications in VHR-PAN. The aim of our study was to evaluate if ciNPWT improves outcomes of VHR-PAN.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent VHR-PAN between 2009 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who received standard sterile dressings (SSD), or (2) ciNPWT. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including surgical site occurrences (SSO) and hernia recurrence.

Results: A total of 114 patients were identified: 57 patients each in the SSD group and ciNPWT group. The groups were similar in demographics and comorbidities. There were more smokers in the SSD group (22.8% versus 5.3%, = 0.013). Hernia defect size was significantly larger in patients who received ciNPWT (202.0 versus 143.4 cm, = 0.010). Overall SSO was similar between the two groups (23.2% versus 26.3%, = 0.663). At a mean follow-up of 6.6 months, hernia recurrence rate was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with that in the ciNPWT group. (10.5% versus 0%, = 0.027). Smoking, diabetes, component separation, mesh type, and location were not significantly associated with hernia recurrence.

Conclusions: Application of incisional NPWT is beneficial in decreasing hernia recurrence in VHR-PAN, compared with standard dressings. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate the utility of ciNPWT in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901215PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hernia recurrence
12
ssd group
12
negative pressure
8
pressure wound
8
wound therapy
8
hernia
8
simultaneous ventral
8
ventral hernia
8
hernia repair
8
repair panniculectomy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!