Prosthesis disuse and abandonment is an ongoing issue in upper-limb amputation. In addition to lost structural and motor function, amputation also results in decreased task-specific sensory information. One proposed remedy is augmenting somatosensory information using vibrotactile feedback to provide tactile feedback of grasping objects. While the role of frontal and parietal areas in motor tasks is well established, the neural and kinematic effects of this augmented vibrotactile feedback remain in question. In this study, we sought to understand the neurobehavioral effects of providing augmented feedback during a reach-grasp-transport task. Ten persons with sound limbs performed a motor task while wearing a prosthesis simulator with and without vibrotactile feedback. We hypothesized that providing vibrotactile feedback during prosthesis use would increase activity in frontal and parietal areas and improve grasp-related behavior. Results show that anticipation of upcoming vibrotactile feedback may be encoded in motor and parietal areas during the reach-to-grasp phase of the task. While grasp aperture is unaffected by vibrotactile feedback, the availability of vibrotactile feedback does lead to a reduction in velocity during object transport. These results help shed light on how engineered feedback is utilized by prostheses users and provide methodologies for further assessment in advanced prosthetics research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06340-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vibrotactile feedback
32
parietal areas
12
feedback
11
vibrotactile
8
availability vibrotactile
8
feedback prosthesis
8
frontal parietal
8
alpha-band activity
4
activity parietofrontal
4
parietofrontal cortex
4

Similar Publications

A synchronized event-cue feedback loop integrating a 3D printed wearable flexible sensor-tactor platform.

Biosens Bioelectron

January 2025

Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA; Institute for Sustainable Energy and Environment, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA. Electronic address:

Wearable devices designed for the somatosensory system aim to provide event-cue feedback electronics and therapeutic stimulation to the peripheral nervous system. This prompts a neurological response that is relayed back to the central nervous system. Unlike virtual reality tools, these devices precisely target peripheral mechanoreceptors by administering specific stimuli.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: New surgeons experience heavy workload during robot-assisted surgery partially because they must use vision to compensate for the lack of haptic feedback. We hypothesize that providing realistic haptic feedback during dry-lab simulation training may accelerate learning and reduce workload during subsequent surgery on patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-blinded study with 12 general surgery residents (third and seventh post-graduate year, PGY) randomized into haptic and control groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

EMG feedback improves force control of a myoelectric hand prosthesis by conveying the magnitude of the myoelectric signal back to the users via tactile stimulation. The present study aimed to test if this method can be used by a participant with a high-level amputation, and whose muscle used for prosthesis control (pectoralis major) was not intuitively related to hand function. Vibrotactile feedback was delivered to the participant's torso, while the control was tested using EMG from three different muscles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) involves challenges in communication and social interaction, including challenges in recognizing emotions. Existing technological solutions aim to improve social behaviors in individuals with ASD by providing learning aids. This paper presents a real-time environmental translator designed to enhance social behaviors in individuals with ASD using sensory substitution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Source localization in EEG necessitates co-registering the EEG sensor locations with the subject's MRI, where EEG sensor locations are typically captured using electromagnetic tracking or 3D scanning of the subject's head with EEG cap, using commercially available 3D scanners. Both methods have drawbacks, where, electromagnetic tracking is slow and immobile, while 3D scanners are expensive. Photogrammetry offers a cost-effective alternative but requires multiple photos to sample the head, with good spatial sampling to adequately reconstruct the head surface.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!