Purpose: To report on the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in clinical practice in Japan.

Patients And Methods: This prospective, noninterventional, multicenter post-authorization safety study enrolled patients who were treated with IVT-AFL for macular edema secondary to CRVO and followed up for 24 months. The primary outcome was the occurrence of safety events. Other pre-specified outcomes were indicators of effectiveness, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and frequency of injections.

Results: The safety analysis included 377 patients who received at least one IVT-AFL. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22 patients (5.84%) and adverse drug reactions occurred in 5 (1.33%) over 24 months. Of the 22 patients with AEs, 72.7% experienced their first AEs by the third injection. The effectiveness analysis set comprised 360 patients for whom data on each outcome could be collected. The number of injections over 24 months was 3.4 ± 2.4 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.709 ± 0.535 (mean ± SD) ( = 357) at baseline and 0.543 ± 0.559 ( = 97) after 24 months of treatment with IVT-AFL. CRT was 552.6 ± 211.3 μm (mean ± SD) ( = 214) at baseline and 331.5 ± 144.0 μm ( = 54) at 24 months.

Conclusion: There were no new safety issues concerning routine administration of IVT-AFL for macular edema secondary to CRVO. BCVA recovered during 24 months of IVT-AFL treatment in the real-world setting. However, there was a trend toward less improvement compared with the results of randomized controlled trials, likely due in part to undertreatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898177PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S344194DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

macular edema
16
edema secondary
16
central retinal
12
ivt-afl macular
12
intravitreal aflibercept
8
secondary central
8
retinal vein
8
vein occlusion
8
secondary crvo
8
ivt-afl
6

Similar Publications

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of vision loss. The development of peripheral non-perfusion (PNP) might be associated with the natural course, severity, and treatment of DME. The present study seeks to understand the predictive power of central macular changes and clinico-demographic features for PNP in patients with clinically significant DME.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinically significant macular edema (CME) is the leading cause of visual loss after ophthalmologic surgery due to the release of inflammatory mediators promoted by the procedures. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intravitreal Ozurdex (700 µg dexamethasone) implants as a primary therapeutical option for post-surgical macular edema cases.

Methods: Patients with post-surgical macular edema diagnosed by optical coherence tomography (Cirrus SD-OCT) and treated with Ozudex were selected for the current study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Determining spectacle-corrected visual acuity (VA) is essential when managing many ophthalmic diseases. If artificial intelligence (AI) evaluations of macular images estimated this VA from a fundus image, AI might provide spectacle-corrected VA without technician costs, reduce visit time, or facilitate home monitoring of VA from fundus images obtained outside of the clinic.

Objective: To estimate spectacle-corrected VA measured on a standard eye chart among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in clinical practice settings using previously validated AI algorithms evaluating best-corrected VA from fundus photographs in eyes with DME.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Alteration of visual acuity in wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is mostly driven by vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)-induced edema from leaky newly forming blood vessels below the retina layers. To date, all therapies aimed at alleviation of this process have relied on inhibition of VEGF-A activity. Although effective in preventing vascular leak and edema, this approach also leads to the loss of normal vasculature and multiple related side effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To compare the effects of intravitreal (IVT) 0.7 mg dexamethasone implants on the intraocular pressure (IOP) in Black patients and White patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). A retrospective cohort study was performed of Black patients and White patients with DME who received dexamethasone implants with 12 or more months of follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!