AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of statins on the progression of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to more severe forms like vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or diabetic macular edema (DME).
  • Using data from a U.S. medical claims database, researchers conducted two cohort studies comparing statin users and non-users; they failed to find any protective effects of statins against DR progression.
  • The findings suggest that factors related to the population studied are more critical than the study methodology in understanding the relationship between statin use and diabetic retinopathy progression.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the effect of statins on progression from nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: Two cohort studies using a U.S. medical claims database from 2002 to 2019 including NPDR patients 18 years or older. A risk factor analysis performed a time-updating cox regression model assessing statin usage. A second new-user active comparator design analysis replicating a previously published study. Main outcomes included a new diagnosis of VTDR (composite of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually for the risk factor study and included additional outcomes of new DR, NPDR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) for the new user study.

Results: Risk factor analysis included 66 617 statin users with NPDR at baseline and 83 365 nonstatin users. Of these, 27 325 (18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4086 (2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22 750 (15.1%) progressed to DME. After multivariable analysis, no protective effect of statin use was found for progression to VTDR, PDR, or DME (HR = 1.01-3, p >0.33 for all comparisons). Replicated new user design analysis also showed no protective effect for statins on risk of development of DR (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, p = 0.13), PDR (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-1.02, p = 0.09), DME (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03, p = 0.21), VH (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16, p = 0.99), and TRD (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.89-1.38, p = 0.36).

Conclusion: Statin use was found not to be protective for progression of DR regardless of study methodology. These results suggest that the specifics of the population studied rather than differing study methodology are important in assessing the effect of statins on DR progression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10210055PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetic retinopathy
16
risk factor
12
statins progression
8
factor analysis
8
design analysis
8
pdr dme
8
analysis protective
8
study methodology
8
pdr
6
statin
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!