Right ventricular ejection fraction with cardiac magnetic resonance using a wall motion score.

Background: The volumetric method in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), the reference standard for right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), requires expertise because of the complex right ventricular geometry and anatomical landmarks.

Aim: The aim of our retrospective study was to describe a new method to evaluate RVEF based on wall motion score index (WMSI) in CMR.

Methods: Visual assessment of wall motion was performed using an eight-segment model (normokinesia=1, hypokinesia=2, akinesia=3). Correlation between WMSI (WMS/8) and the reference volumetric RVEF was analysed. A regression equation was derived to convert the WMSI into RVEF. The accuracy of CMR WMSI-derived RVEF compared with CMR volumetric RVEF was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: In the 112 patients using the volumetric method, the mean RVEF was 48±14%. Fifty-nine patients had normal RV kinetics (WMSI=1), which corresponded to a volumetric RVEF of 56% (standard deviation 7%; range 43-76%). CMR WMSI showed a strong correlation with CMR volumetric RVEF (Spearman's Rho=-0.69). A regression equation was created: RVEF=80-22×WMSI. Overall, the WMSI-derived RVEF resulted in good agreement with the CMR volumetric RVEF (mean bias-3%, standard deviation±7.5%). In addition, using a WMSI cut-off of≥1.5 was highly accurate (92%) to predict a reference RVEF of˂45%, an important prognostic indicator in CMR.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that using the WMS in CMR (eight-segment) to estimate RVEF is accurate, and correlates well with the volumetric method. A WMSI≥1.5 is optimal to categorize patients in the higher-risk subset of CMR RVEF˂45%.