Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The application value of cerebral perfusion imaging, such as fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission computed tomography (FDG-PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the prognostic assessment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains unclear. Thus, it was the focus of this meta-analysis, which aimed to provide a theoretical basis for early diagnosis of neurological diseases.
Methods: The Boolean logic retrieval method was used to retrieve related literature, with "cognitive disorder", "cerebral perfusion imaging", "cerebral imaging", "mild cognitive impairment", and "prognostic assessment" as search terms. The PubMed, Medline, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and other databases were searched from the date of establishment of the database to December 30, 2020 for literature on the prognostic assessment of MCI using FDG-PET, SPECT, and MRI imaging. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software.
Results: A total of 16 references were identified, most of which had a low risk of bias (i.e. medium and high-quality). The meta-analysis results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET imaging was significantly higher than those of SPECT and MRI imaging, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves for the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET, SPECT, and MRI imaging did not present a "shoulder arm" distribution, and there was no threshold effect.
Discussion: Cerebral perfusion imaging has good prognostic value for patients with MCI, and FDG-PET imaging has better predictive ability of the prognosis for patients with MCI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-3916 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!