Avoiding "False Positive" and "False Negative" Immunohistochemical Results in Breast Pathology.

Pathobiology

Chief of Pathology and Director of Second Opinion Service, PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, California, USA.

Published: October 2022

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an important role in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens to provide both diagnostic and prognostic/therapeutic information. Although most IHCs used in breast pathology can be easily interpreted, pitfalls do exist, especially in some uncommon scenarios. This review intends to focus on the challenging areas such as the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers in differentiating benign proliferation and in situ carcinoma from invasive carcinoma, lobular cell markers in differentiating lobular from ductal carcinoma, cytokeratin and other markers in diagnosing metaplastic carcinoma, and breast tissue origin markers in diagnosing breast primary carcinoma. The challenges in interpreting prognostic and predictive markers will be also discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000521682DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast pathology
12
cell markers
8
markers differentiating
8
markers diagnosing
8
breast
5
markers
5
carcinoma
5
avoiding "false
4
"false positive"
4
positive" "false
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!