Mapping of Level I Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Optimal Target Delineation and Treatment Techniques for Breast and Level I Axilla Irradiation.

Purpose: To map the locations of level I axilla (Ax-L1) lymph nodes (LNs), evaluate the clinical target volume (CTV) coverage defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Breast Cancer Atlas, and assess the optimal techniques for whole-breast and Ax-L1 irradiation (WBI + Ax-L1).

Methods And Materials: We identified 76 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer with 1 to 4 positive LNs confirmed by axillary dissection. The locations of 116 involved Ax-L1 LNs on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) were mapped onto simulated CT images of a standard patient. Ax-L1 LN coverage by the RTOG atlas was evaluated, and a modified Ax-L1 CTV with better coverage was proposed. Treatment plans were designed for WBI + Ax-L1 with high tangential simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy (HT-sIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and for WBI + RTOG Ax-L1 with VMAT with a prescription dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, respectively. The differences in dosimetric parameters were compared.

Results: The RTOG Atlas missed 29.3% of LNs. Modification by extending 1 cm caudal and 0.5 cm anterior to the RTOG-defined CTV borders allowed the modified Ax-L1 CTV to encompass 90.5% of LNs. All plans met the required prescription dose to WBI and Ax-L1. The mean dose and the V20 and V5 (percentage volume receiving 20 Gy and 5 Gy) of the ipsilateral lung were 11.7 Gy, 23.0%, and 38.1% for HT-sIMRT WBI + Ax-L1 and 8.9 Gy, 16.4%, and 32.5% for VMAT WBI + Ax-L1 plans, respectively. The mean heart doses in the left-sided plans were 3.2 Gy and 3.0 Gy, respectively. The V30 of the humeral head and the minimum dose to the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel junction were 2.0% versus 1.8% and 45.5 Gy versus 45.7 Gy for VMAT WBI + Ax-L1 and VMAT WBI + RTOG Ax-L1 plans, respectively.

Conclusions: A modified Ax-L1 CTV with expansion of the caudal and anterior borders might provide better coverage. Compared with HT-sIMRT WBI + Ax-L1, VMAT WBI + Ax-L1 provided an adequate dose to the Ax-L1 while decreasing the doses to most normal tissues. Coverage of the modified Ax-L1 did not increase the dose to organs at risk compared with coverage of RTOG Ax-L1.