AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to see if state laws limiting minors' access to confidential HIV testing without parental consent affected HIV testing among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) in the U.S.
  • Secondary data was analyzed from a national trial involving YMSM aged 13-17, assessing the relationship between state policies and factors like HIV testing behavior and awareness of home-based testing.
  • Results showed that while living in states with restrictive testing policies didn't significantly impact overall HIV testing behavior, it did correlate with lower awareness of home-based testing options among YMSM.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine whether state-level policies that restrict minors' access to confidential HIV testing without parental consent may suppress HIV testing in young men who have sex with men (YMSM) in the United States.

Methods: Secondary data from a national HIV prevention trial among YMSM aged 13-17 years (N= 612) were analyzed to evaluate the association between living in a state with restrictive HIV testing policies for minors and HIV testing behavior, awareness of home-based HIV testing, and confidential interactions with a physician. Multilevel logistic regression models were adjusted for age, parents' education level, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, being sexually experienced, and health literacy of medical forms and controlled for clustering by state. Age-stratified models by state-level age of consent for HIV testing and a subanalysis (including only sexually experienced participants) were also conducted.

Results: Residing in a state with restrictive HIV testing policies was associated with the lack of awareness of home-based HIV testing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.06; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.49, 6.28). No significant associations were found for HIV testing behavior (aOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 0.85, 3.84), speaking privately with a physician (aOR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.79), or discussing confidentiality with a physician (aOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.71) and HIV testing policies for minors. These results were consistent in both the age-stratified models and subanalysis.

Discussion: HIV testing proportions among YMSM did not differ by state-level minor consent laws. However, YMSM living in states with restrictive policies on HIV testing for minors were less likely to be aware of home-based HIV testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9133134PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.12.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hiv testing
64
testing
16
testing policies
16
hiv
16
home-based hiv
16
policies minors
12
testing behavior
12
awareness home-based
12
behavior awareness
8
testing young
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!