Objective: To compare unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for the treatment of Gustilo-Anderson type II and IIIA open tibial fractures admitted to a hospital in rural Uganda.

Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Regional referral hospital in Uganda.

Patients: Fifty-five skeletally mature patients with a Gustilo-Anderson type II or IIIA open tibia shaft fracture treated within 24 hours of injury between May 2016 and December 2019.

Intervention: Unreamed intramedullary nailing (n = 31) versus external fixation (n = 24).

Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome was function within 12 months of injury, measured using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 3-level version of the 5-dimension EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D-3L), radiographic healing using the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST) fractures score, and clinical complications.

Results: Treatment with an intramedullary nail resulted in a 1.0-point higher [95% credible intervals (CrI), 0.1 to 1.9] FIX-IT score compared with external fixation. Results were similar for the secondary patient-reported outcomes, EQ-5D-3L and the visual analog scale component of the EuroQol instrument (EQ-VAS). RUST scores were not different between groups at any time point. Treatment with an intramedullary nail was associated with a 22.1% (95% CrI, -42.6% to 1.7%) lower rate of malunion and a 20.8% (95% CrI, -44.0% to 2.9%) lower rate of superficial infection.

Conclusion: In rural Uganda, treatment of open tibial shaft fractures with an unreamed intramedullary nail results in marginal clinically important improvements in functional outcomes, although there is likely an important reduction in malunion and superficial infection.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391253PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002362DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unreamed intramedullary
16
external fixation
16
intramedullary nailing
12
nailing versus
12
versus external
12
open tibial
12
intramedullary nail
12
fixation treatment
8
treatment open
8
tibial shaft
8

Similar Publications

Tibial shaft fractures are a prevalent and challenging orthopedic injury, often resulting from high-energy trauma. Optimal management of these fractures is crucial to prevent complications such as nonunion, malunion, and prolonged functional impairment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is widely regarded as the gold standard for treating these injuries due to its ability to provide stable fixation, preserve soft tissues, and enable early mobilization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: There is a high incidence of open fractures accounting 23% of all tibial fractures. The minimal soft tissue and precarious blood supply of the shaft of tibia make these fractures vulnerable to complications. The treatment should be decided through thoughtful analysis for personality of injuries and the status of the soft tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?

Can J Surg

July 2023

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ont. (Schemitsch, Sanders); Division of Orthopaedics, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Kumar); the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Heels-Ansdell, Sprague, Bhandari, Guyatt, Walter); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Sprague, Bhandari); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. (Swiontkowski); the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass. (Tornetta).

Background: Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations.

Methods: Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction And Importance: Femoral shaft fracture is one of the most frequent injuries encountered by an orthopedic surgeon. Surgical treatment is commonly needed. Intramedullary nailing remains the gold-standard in surgical treatment of femoral shaft fracture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The local inflammatory impact of different reaming protocols in intramedullary nailing has been sparsely investigated. We examined the effect of different reaming protocols on fracture hematoma (FH) immunological characteristics in pigs. To do so, a standardized midshaft femur fracture was induced in adult male pigs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!