AI Article Synopsis

  • A Critical view of safety (CVS) in cholecystectomy has led to the development of strategies like subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) and risk classifications (Parkland grading scale, PGS) to enhance surgical safety and minimize complications.
  • A survey of 744 respondents, including residents and graduated surgeons in Mexico, revealed a significant gap in correctly understanding these safety concepts, despite a high percentage claiming familiarity.
  • Correct knowledge of CVS, SC, PGS, and related protocols is linked to a reduced risk of complications like bile duct injury, highlighting the need for better education on these critical safety measures among medical professionals.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Since the establishment of the Critical view of safety (CVS), different strategies have been created such as bailout procedures (SC, subtotal cholecystectomy), classifications for preoperative and intraoperative complexity (The Parkland grading scale, PGS) and objective evaluation of the CVS (doublet score, DS) to establish a "Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy, COSIC"; to avoid complications.

Methods: A multiple choice questionnaire was applied to residents and graduated surgeons from different Hospitals in Mexico during different national meetings; evaluating the knowledge of this different concepts (CVS, SC, PGS, DS), univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of the knowledge with adverse events (AE) like the Bile duct injury.

Results: A total of 744 questionnaires were evaluated; 284 (38.17%) women and 460 (61.83%) men; 436 (58.6%) were residents and 308 (41.4%) graduated surgeons. 708 (95.16%) reported knowing the CVS; however, only (51.98%, p ≤ 0.001) defined the concept correctly, while 136 (18.28%) reported knowing the DS, but only 44 (5.91%) defined it correctly. Regarding the PGS, 398 (53.49%) mentioned knowing it, but only 262 defined it correctly. The concept of SC 642 (86.29%) reported knowing it; however, only (56.7%, p ≤ 0.001) correctly defined the techniques, being the reconstituting technique the preferred one (42.37% vs 34.89%). In this survey, the correct knowledge of the CVS (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), the subtotal techniques (OR 0.71 p = 0.07), the DS (OR 0.48 p < 0.001) and of the PGS (OR 0.28, p < 0.001) decreased the risk of presenting BDI.

Conclusion: Despite the COSIC and the timing of publication of the CVS; the percentage of people who can correctly define basic safety concepts is low among residents and licensed surgeons. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the dissemination of these concepts to obtain safe LC and thus reduce the incidence of complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09120-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reported knowing
12
critical view
8
view safety
8
graduated surgeons
8
defined correctly
8
cvs
5
evaluation knowledge
4
knowledge critical
4
safety recognition
4
recognition transoperative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!