Impact of Tofacitinib on Components of the ACR Response Criteria: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III and Phase IIIb/IV Trials.

J Rheumatol

R.F. van Vollenhoven, MD, PhD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: June 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how tofacitinib (TOF) affects the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • Researchers analyzed data from various phase III clinical trials comparing TOF, adalimumab (ADA), and placebo, focusing on improvement rates in patient symptoms over different timeframes.
  • Results showed that, while physician-reported improvements were higher, the alignment between patient-reported symptoms and physician assessments differed, emphasizing the need for better patient-reported outcome measures to effectively manage RA.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of tofacitinib (TOF) on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: This post hoc analysis pooled data from RA phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing TOF 5 or 10 mg BID, adalimumab (ADA), or placebo, with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and a phase IIIb/IV RCT assessing TOF 5 mg BID monotherapy, TOF 5 mg BID with methotrexate (MTX), or ADA with MTX. Outcomes included proportions of patients achieving ACR20/50/70 responses and ≥ 20/50/70% improvement rates in ACR components at week 2 and months 1, 3, and 6; and mean percent improvement in ACR components and Clinical or Simplified Disease Activity Index (CDAI or SDAI) low disease activity or remission rates, at month 3, for ACR20/50/70 responders.

Results: Across treatment groups, ≥ 20/50/70% improvement rates were numerically higher for most physician- vs patient-reported measures. In phase III RCTs, at earlier timepoints, ≥ 50/70% improvements in patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, and physician global assessment were similar. Among ACR20 responders receiving TOF, mean percent improvements for tender and swollen joint counts were > 70% at month 3. CDAI/SDAI remission was achieved at month 3 by 27.8-45.0% of ACR70 responders receiving TOF.

Conclusion: Among ACR20 responders treated with TOF, physician-reported components particularly exceeded 20% response improvement. At month 3, disease state generally did not corroborate ACR70 response criteria. Divergences between physician- and patient-reported measures highlight the importance of identifying appropriate patient-reported outcome targets to manage RA symptoms in clinical practice. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00847613/NCT00856544/NCT00853385/NCT02187055).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210707DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

response criteria
12
phase iii
12
tof bid
12
disease activity
12
acr response
8
post hoc
8
hoc analysis
8
phase iiib/iv
8
assessing tof
8
≥ 20/50/70%
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!