AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to examine how well the Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) work with Japanese healthcare claims data and their link to long-term outcomes like mortality and long-term care (LTC) needs.
  • - Conducted with a large group of enrollees aged 50 and older in Japan from 2014 to 2018, the study found that eFI categorized nearly 43% as fit while HFRS identified 73% as low risk, revealing significant associations between higher frailty scores and increased mortality and LTC usage.
  • - Results showed that the frailty algorithms can successfully identify individuals at risk for negative long-term outcomes, suggesting they could be

Article Abstract

Objectives: To assess the applicability of Electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) algorithms to Japanese administrative claims data and to evaluate their association with long-term outcomes.

Study Design And Setting: A cohort study using a regional government administrative healthcare and long-term care (LTC) claims database in Japan 2014-18.

Participants: Plan enrollees aged ≥50 years.

Methods: We applied the two algorithms to the cohort and assessed the scores' distributions alongside enrollees' 4-year mortality and initiation of government-supported LTC. Using Cox regression and Fine-Gray models, we evaluated the association between frailty scores and outcomes as well as the models' discriminatory ability.

Results: Among 827,744 enrollees, 42.8% were categorised by eFI as fit, 31.2% mild, 17.5% moderate and 8.5% severe. For HFRS, 73.0% were low, 24.3% intermediate and 2.7% high risk; 35 of 36 predictors for eFI, and 92 of 109 codes originally used for HFRS were available in the Japanese system. Relative to the lowest frailty group, the highest frailty group had hazard ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 2.09 (1.98-2.21) for mortality and 2.45 (2.28-2.63) for LTC for eFI; those for HFRS were 3.79 (3.56-4.03) and 3.31 (2.87-3.82), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for the unadjusted model at 48 months was 0.68 for death and 0.68 for LTC for eFI, and 0.73 and 0.70, respectively, for HFRS.

Conclusions: The frailty algorithms were applicable to the Japanese system and could contribute to the identifications of enrollees at risk of long-term mortality or LTC use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077119PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frailty algorithms
8
cohort study
8
japanese system
8
frailty group
8
ltc efi
8
frailty
7
efi
5
ltc
5
assessment coding-based
4
coding-based frailty
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!