Sleep of recruits throughout basic military training and its relationships with stress, recovery, and fatigue.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia.

Published: August 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to assess how sleep quantity and quality, stress, fatigue, and recovery change over 12 weeks of basic military training (BMT) among 45 recruits.
  • Recruits wore devices to track their sleep patterns, and self-reported data on stress, fatigue, and recovery was collected through surveys.
  • Results indicated recruits averaged only 6.3 hours of sleep per night, which negatively affected their training outcomes, highlighting a strong link between sleep quality and perceptions of stress and fatigue.

Article Abstract

Objective: Studies in basic military training (BMT) examining sleep are largely cross-sectional, and do not investigate relationships between sleep, stress, recovery and fatigue. The aims of this study were to (1a) quantify changes in recruits' sleep quantity and quality over 12 weeks of BMT; (1b) quantify changes in recruits' perceptions of stress, fatigue and recovery over BMT; and (2) explore relationships between sleep, and perceptions of stress, fatigue and recovery.

Methods: 45 recruits (37 male; 8 female, age: 25.2 ± 7.2 years, height: 176.2 ± 10.0 cm, mass: 76.8 ± 15.0 kg) wore ActiGraph GT9X's for 12 weeks of BMT, collecting sleep duration, efficiency and awakenings. Subjective sleep quality, fatigue were measured daily, with stress and recovery measured weekly. Multi-level models assessed relationships between sleep, and stress, recovery, and fatigue.

Results: Objective daily means for sleep duration were 6.3 h (± 1.2 h) and 85.6% (± 5.5%) for sleep efficiency. Main effects were detected for all mean weekly values (p < 0.05). Sleep quality showed the strongest relationships with stress, recovery and fatigue. The best model to explain relationships between, stress, recovery and fatigue, included sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency and awakenings.

Conclusions: The reported mean sleep duration of 6.3 h per night may negatively impact training outcomes across BMT. Combining both subjective and objective measures of sleep best explained relationships between sleep metrics stress, fatigue and recovery. Perceived sleep quality was most strongly related to change in stress, recovery, or post-sleep fatigue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273528PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01845-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress recovery
16
relationships sleep
12
sleep
10
basic military
8
military training
8
recovery fatigue
8
sleep stress
8
quantify changes
8
changes recruits'
8
12 weeks bmt
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!