Thorax trauma severity score in patient with chest trauma: study at tertiary-level hospital.

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Department of Biochemistry, Shri. Vasantrao Naik Govt Medical College, Yavatmal, 445001 Maharashtra India.

Published: March 2022

Background: Thoracic trauma accounts for 20-25% of all trauma-related mortalities and the majority of these deaths occur within few hours of hospitalization. Therefore, prompt diagnosis, assessment of the severity of chest trauma, and immediate treatment are essential to prevent morbidity and mortality. The thorax trauma severity score (TTSS) can be calculated in the emergency room with ease. However, the validity of the TTSS score has still not been evaluated in the Indian setting. This study was conducted with the objective to assess the prognostic role of TTSS to predict the patient's outcome with thoracic trauma.

Method: A prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, India, from 1st March 2018 to 31st December 2019. A total of 284 patients, primarily admitted for chest trauma, were included in the study. TTSS was used to assess the severity of the trauma; the outcome (non-hospitalized survivors, hospitalized survivors, and hospitalized non-survivors) was recorded along with the patient's data and the scoring system. Patients were grouped as per a TTSS score range. Group I includes patients with a TTSS score of 0-5 points, group II patients with a TTSS score of 6-10, group III patients with a TTSS score of 11-15, group IV patients with a TTTS score of 16-20, and group V patients with a TTSS score of 21-25. Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative data. To evaluate the statistical significance of sensitivity and specificity and to choose suitable cut-off points to make decisions, the receiver operator curve (ROC) was used.

Results: The present study included 239 male (84.2%) and 45 female patients (15.8%) with a mean age of 41.57 with a standard deviation of ± 16 years. Sixty-seven (3.9%) patients were non-hospitalized survivors, 202 (71.1%) patients were hospitalized survivors, and 15 (5.3%) patients were hospitalized non-survivors. Two hundred and nineteen (77.1%) patients required conservative management, 49 (17.3%) had unilateral closed thoracostomy, and 11 (3.9%) patients required bilateral thoracostomy. Thoracotomy was required in 3 patients. No mortality was seen in groups I, II, and III. All the 9 patients with TTSS score 21-25 points had fatal prognoses. A TTSS score of 7.5 and above was associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with thoracic injuries.

Conclusion: The outcome of thoracic trauma patients can be predicted by using the TTSS. A score of 7.5 and above was associated with morbidity and a score of 20 and above predicted the fatal prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857329PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01312-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ttss score
36
patients ttss
20
patients
17
score
13
chest trauma
12
ttss
12
group patients
12
thorax trauma
8
trauma severity
8
severity score
8

Similar Publications

Background: Available guidelines lack in indications on surgical standard in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) AIMS: To determine the role of surgical strategies of colectomy and proctectomy with pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) on functional outcomes in a nationwide population multicenter study. The secondary aims consisted of perioperative outcomes and complications.

Methods: Data on 379 patients who underwent total abdominal colectomy and proctectomy with ileo-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) with or without diverting ileostomy were retrospectively collected in a red cap multicenter-database searching for variables that could impact on pouch outcomes as cuffitis, pouchitis, anastomotic stenosis, pouch stenosis, failure or pathological Low-Anterior-Resection-Syndrome (LARS) score.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to validate various chest trauma scoring systems for classifying and treating polytrauma patients by analyzing data from 1,038 individuals.
  • It found that complications were more common in older patients, particularly those with head trauma, as indicated by poorer Glasgow Coma Scale scores and more severe rib fractures.
  • The Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) was the most predictive scoring system, but overall, existing chest trauma scoring systems, including TTSS, are not suitable for clinical use in polytrauma cases, necessitating further revisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Behavior therapy is crucial for treating Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD), but access to this therapy and its long-term effectiveness remain unclear.* -
  • The study aimed to compare the long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-supported, internet-delivered exposure and response prevention (ERP) versus psychoeducation in youth with TS or CTD.* -
  • Conducted in Stockholm, the trial involved 221 participants aged 9-17, with a focus on tic severity improvement and a detailed economic evaluation of both treatment approaches.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: There are several anastomotic techniques available to facilitate restorative rectal cancer surgery after total mesorectal excision (TME), including double-stapled anastomosis (DST) and handsewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA). However, to date no one technique is superior with regard to anastomotic leakage (AL) or functional outcomes. Transanal transection single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS) aims to overcome some of the technical challenges and offer comparable clinical and functional outcomes to traditional anastomotic techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To provide a scientifc tool, the Temptations to Try Smoking Scale (TTSS) is introduced to evaluate its reliability and validity in preventing and intervening Chinese adolescents from smoking temptations.

Methods: A questionnaire, including the TTSS, the Chinese version of the Decisional Balance Scale (CDBS), the Adolescent Smoking Curiosity Scale (ASCOS), and the Sensation-Seeking Scale (SSS), is used to test 1195 Chinese adolescent volunteers (214 of them are retested after 1 month). If all six items in the TTSS are retained, the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) reveals that the TTSS exhibits a structure of two factors: positive social and curiosity/stress.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!