Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (TLU and RLU).
Materials And Methods: We undertook a literature search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Search date will range from inception to January 1, 2020. The final article results will be analyzed using StataSE 12 software. This meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines, and a protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020160906).
Results: Eleven articles eventually met the requirements, involving a total of 609 patients. The final result shows the operative time (Std. Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.80; p < 0.01), hospital stay (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI 0.02-0.49; p = 0.031), and the complication of paralytic ileus (risk difference = 0.11; 95% CI 0.05-0.17; p < 0.01) are significant difference between TLU and RLU, and TLU are higher or longer.
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that if there are no other constraints, it is better to choose RLU. And more clinical trial data are needed to confirm this conclusion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522103 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Predictors of delayed hospital discharge after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the impact of single-port robotic surgery.
World J Urol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 970, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the predictors of delayed discharge for patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at our Institution since the introduction of the single port (SP) robotic system.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing RAPN from September 2020 to August 2024. Patients were categorized by the postoperative day of their discharge: POD1 (single overnight stay) or POD > 1 (more than one night stay).
Comparison of the effects of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Pak J Med Sci
November 2024
Peng Pan, Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, 212001, China.
Objective: To compare the effects of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on RAPN at Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University. Between September 2020 and February 2024, the included patients underwent either transperitoneal approach or retroperitoneal approach.
Cutaneous ureterostomy following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a multicenter comparative study of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal techniques.
World J Urol
October 2024
Department of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18- 15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in perioperative outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal techniques in cutaneous ureterostomy (CUS).
Methods: Between 2018 and 2023, 55 patients underwent CUS following robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Among the 55 patients, we compared 33 patients who underwent transperitoneal CUS (t-CUS) and 22 who underwent retroperitoneal CUS (r-CUS).
Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.
Urolithiasis
October 2024
Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1666668111, Iran.
Article Synopsis
- The study compares outcomes and complications of two types of laparoscopic surgery for large kidney stones: retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP) and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (TLP), analyzing data from 273 patients.
- Findings show that while stone size was larger in the TLP group, both types had similar operation times, hospital stays, and complication rates, except for a significantly higher rate of postoperative fever in the TLP group.
- The study concludes that RLP may be a better alternative to TLP due to the lower incidence of postoperative fever, suggesting it could be a preferred method for treating large kidney stones.
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; a single surgeon's experience.
World J Urol
October 2024
Department of Urology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to compare two surgical approaches—transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (TLPL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLPL)—in treating large kidney stones over a period of ten years.
- Both methods had similar demographic and clinical outcomes, such as operation time and stone sizes, but TLPL resulted in longer hospital stays, greater drops in hemoglobin, and higher rates of postoperative fever compared to RLPL.
- Overall, the retroperitoneal approach showed benefits like shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, while both methods had similar success in effectively clearing the stones.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!