Knee Ligament Sprains: Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by Patient Interview. Development and Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Score (ACLIS).

Background: Knee ligament sprains are a common reason for emergency-room visits. Initially, the often difficult physical examination provides limited information, creating a risk of missing cruciate-ligament injuries, which can result in substantial functional impairments. No simple tool is available to emergency and primary-care physicians for decisions regarding specialist referral of patients with knee ligament sprains. An easy to use clinical score for the emergency setting would help identify patients at high risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears after knee ligament sprains. The primary objective of this study, in two separate cohorts with acute knee injuries, was to develop, then validate a score for assessing the probability of ACL tear and, therefore, the need for specialist referral.

Hypothesis: A score based on patient-interview information with a cut-off associated to good sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for ACL tears can be developed.

Material And Methods: A literature review identified seven items to be used in the score: pivoting and contact activity at the time of injury, perceived cracking sound, sensation of dislocation, joint effusion, suggestive mechanism, inability to resume the activity, and immediate sensation of instability upon walking. To select the most relevant items, we recruited a development cohort of 228 patients (127 males and 101 females) with a mean age of 32±9 years who were seen for knee injuries between November 2017 and November 2018 at three healthcare institutions; 183 (80%) had ACL tears. The score was then tested in a validation cohort of 121 patients (79 males and 42 females) with a mean age of 28±2.5 years seen at two healthcare institutions between November 2019 and November 2020; 81 (67%) had ACL tears. In all patients, the diagnosis of ACL tear was confirmed by a specialist examination and magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: Four items proved both sensitive and specific for ACL injury and were combined into the score: an immediate sensation of knee instability, an inability to resume the sports activity, a sensation of dislocation, and injury during a pivoting-contact activity. Patient report of two or more of these four criteria had 96% sensitivity and 66% specificity for ACL tear, with a PPV of 91% and an NPV of 83%. Results were similar in the validation cohort, confirming that a cut-off of at least two of the four items strongly suggested an ACL tear, with 94% sensitivity, 56% specificity, a PPV of 82% and an NPV of 82%.

Conclusion: The ACLIS score performs well for the emergency-room diagnosis of ACL tear, with 95% sensitivity, 62% specificity, an 88% PPV, and an 82% NPV. Patients with ACLIS scores of 2 or more probably require specialist referral with or without magnetic resonance imaging. The ACLIS score could be used routinely in emergency departments to decrease the proportion of patients with undiagnosed ACL tears.

Level Of Evidence: III, prospective case-control study of a diagnostic score.