Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 in an emergency department.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Published: April 2022

Use of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 has become widespread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal rapid antigen diagnostic (RAD) immunoassay LumiraDx UK in an Emergency Department (ED). All patients admitted to our ED between November 11 and December 8, 2020, and had both a RAD test and a real-time-reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) test were enrolled. RAD was considered as the index test and RT-PCR test was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated with the 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity and specificity of RAD were 34.2% and 92.3%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.4 and 0.71. Our results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LumiraDx RAD test is too low for routine use as a diagnostic method in the ED.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8761115PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115635DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rapid antigen
8
emergency department
8
diagnostic accuracy
8
rad test
8
rt-pcr test
8
sensitivity specificity
8
likelihood ratios
8
test
6
rad
5
diagnostic accuracy rapid
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!