A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predictive Factors for Concurrent Tegmen Dehiscence in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome. | LitMetric

Objectives: To describe factors predictive of tegmen dehiscence in subjects with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).

Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Subjects with SCDS who underwent middle fossa craniotomy (MFC) for plugging/resurfacing.

Main Outcome Measures: Operative and radiographic findings of tegmen dehiscences, preoperative low frequency air-bone gaps (LF-ABGs), ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) amplitudes, size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), and history of obesity or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Results: One hundred thirty six patients (avg. age, 50.6 yr, 55.1% female) underwent MFC for repair of SCDS. Tegmen dehiscences were commonly found intraoperatively (tegmen tympani dehiscence [TTD] in 19.9% [11% with dural contact of ossicles], tegmen mastoideum dehiscence [TMD] in 28.7%). There were no differences in preoperative LF-ABGs and preoperative oVEMP amplitudes with respect to tegmen status. The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) for predicting an intraoperatively confirmed TTD was 85 and 74%, respectively, and 44 and 79% for TMD. History of obesity and OSA did not differ between those with and without tegmen dehiscences. The presence of contralateral SCD and increasing cross-sectional area of SCD were both significantly associated with concurrent tegmen defects.

Conclusions: Obesity, OSA, preoperative oVEMP, and LF-ABG do not differ between those with SCD alone and those with SCD and concurrent tegmen dehiscences. Likewise, CT scans have relatively low sensitivity for identifying tegmen dehiscences. The presence of concurrent tegmen defects is more common in subjects with larger SCD cross-sectional areas and contralateral SCD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003481DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tegmen dehiscences
20
concurrent tegmen
16
tegmen
12
canal dehiscence
12
tegmen dehiscence
8
dehiscence syndrome
8
superior semicircular
8
semicircular canal
8
ovemp amplitudes
8
history obesity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!