A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessionapiaqcu5a03frk06d5lncj14o5toqpgl): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Direct Comparison of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation and Contact Force-Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis compared second-generation cryoballoon (2G-CB) ablation to contact force-sensing radiofrequency (CF-RF) ablation for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and found no significant differences in success rates for freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs), freedom from AF, or acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
  • The 2G-CB ablation procedure took about 18.78 minutes less time than CF-RF ablation, but the fluoroscopy times were similar across both methods.
  • However, patients undergoing 2G-CB ablation experienced a higher incidence of phrenic nerve paralysis, making the risks

Article Abstract

The superiority of second-generation cryoballoon (2G-CB) ablation versus contact force-sensing radiofrequency (CF-RF) ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was assessed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) (OR = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68 to 1.17; = 0.41), freedom from AF (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.35; = 0.72), and acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.54 to 2.53; = 0.70) between 2G-CB ablation and CF-RF ablation were not different. The procedure time for the 2G-CB ablation was shorter (MD = -18.78 min; 95% CI = -27.72 to -9.85 min; < 0.01), while the fluoroscopy time was similar (MD = 2.66 min; 95% CI = -0.52 to 5.83 min; = 0.10). In the 2G-CB ablation group, phrenic nerve paralysis was more common (OR = 5.74; 95% CI = 1.80 to 18.31; = < 0.01). Regarding freedom from ATAs, freedom from AF, and acute PVI, these findings imply that 2G-CB ablation is not superior to CF-RF ablation in paroxysmal AF. Although faster than CF-RF ablation, 2G-CB ablation has a greater risk of phrenic nerve paralysis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8876986PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020298DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

2g-cb ablation
24
cf-rf ablation
16
ablation
12
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
second-generation cryoballoon
8
contact force-sensing
8
force-sensing radiofrequency
8
ablation patients
8
patients paroxysmal
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis compared second-generation cryoballoon (2G-CB) ablation to contact force-sensing radiofrequency (CF-RF) ablation for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and found no significant differences in success rates for freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs), freedom from AF, or acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
  • The 2G-CB ablation procedure took about 18.78 minutes less time than CF-RF ablation, but the fluoroscopy times were similar across both methods.
  • However, patients undergoing 2G-CB ablation experienced a higher incidence of phrenic nerve paralysis, making the risks
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Second-generation cryoballoon (2G-CB) ablation is highly effective for achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a promising clinical outcome. However, the ideal freezing strategy for preventing gastroesophageal excessive transmural injury (ETI) remains under debate. This study aimed to clarify the correlation between gastroesophageal ETI and a bonus-freeze protocol after PVI using 2G-CBs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Growing evidence suggests that second-generation cryoballoon ablation (2G-CB) is effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). The cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The purpose of this study was to summarize the available data on the safety and mid-term (≥ 12 months) effectiveness of a 'PVI-only' strategy vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Second generation cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis.

Clin Res Cardiol

February 2018

Clinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Background: Catheter ablation is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The cornerstone of AF ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The second-generation cryoballoon (2G-CB) has shown non-inferiority to radiofrequency (RF) ablation in paroxysmal AF in several trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!