Background: The present retrospective analysis aimed to compare two different single tooth extraction surgical approaches in both premolar and molar areas: less traumatic magneto-electrical versus conventional tooth extraction in minimizing the edentulous ridge volume loss.

Methods: In the present retrospective control trial, 48 patients who underwent one-tooth extraction, were allocated either to control (28 sites treated with conventional tooth extraction procedures) or test group (20 subjects treated with less traumatic tooth extraction procedures by tooth sectioning and magnetoelectric roots subluxation). Intraoperatively (during tooth extraction surgery just after the subsequent filling of the alveolar socket with the sterile fast re-absorbable gelatin sponge), and then four months later, contours of the sockets were acquired through a laser intra-oral scanner. The digitally superimposed models were converted to dicom (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) format first, then volumetric and area evaluations were performed with a DentaScan tool package. Non-parametric tests were applied with a level of significance set at < 0.01.

Results: significant reductions of anatomical features were observed four months later in all the groups (-values < 0.001) with volume losses leading to a final alveolar ridge volume of 0.87 ± 0.34 cm for atraumatic extractions and 0.66 ± 0.19 cm for conventional extractions. No significant differences were registered for outcomes related to the basal surface variables. When just molar tooth were considered, the outcomes relating to volume loss between baseline and four months (ΔV) and its percentage (ΔV%) showed a better behavior in the less traumatic procedure (ΔV = -0.30 ± 0.10 cm and ΔV% = -22.3 ± 8.4%) compared to the conventional extractions (ΔV = -0.59 ± 0.10 cm and ΔV% = -44.3 ± 5.8%) with -values < 0.0001.

Conclusions: at four months, the less traumatic tooth extraction procedures by tooth sectioning and magnetoelectric root subluxation seemed to be able to better preserve the volume of the alveolar crest (reduction close to 22% with less traumatic extraction in molar sites) when compared to subjects treated with the conventional tooth extraction techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875248PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tooth extraction
32
conventional tooth
12
extraction procedures
12
tooth
11
extraction
10
ridge volume
8
treated conventional
8
subjects treated
8
traumatic tooth
8
procedures tooth
8

Similar Publications

Therapeutic extraction of second molars in orthodontics: a scoping review.

BMC Oral Health

January 2025

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Objective: To review the literature to identify the present evidence on the extraction of second molars in orthodontics.

Materials & Method: A search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science™, and ProQuest databases for full-text articles was done on March 5, 2024. The search went back till the 1st of January 1991 and was limited to articles in English.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

After tooth extraction, alveolar bone absorbs unevenly, leading to soft tissue collapse, which hinders full regeneration. Bone loss makes it harder to do dental implants and repairs. Inspired by the biological architecture of bone, a deformable SIS/HA (Small intestinal submucosa/Hydroxyapatite) composite hydrogel coaxial scaffold was designed to maintain bone volume in the socket.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tooth extraction without socket preservation will lead to reduction in the dimensions and volume of the alveolar bone. Bone defects resulting from tooth extraction not only hinder prosthetic reconstruction but also present aesthetic issues and complicating dental implant treatment. Purple leaves contains flavonoids, steroids, tannins, saponins,and non-toxic alkaloids.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tooth degradation develops easily over time from initial caries to deeper cavities. The quality and durability of restorations are crucial in a patients' life, and it is primarily determined by the mechanical properties of the restorations. Clinicians and engineers apply biomimetic science in dentistry to mimic the natural design of the teeth and emphasize careful material selection as well as bond strength between the tissue and artificial material.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Soft-tissue defect is commonly seen in immediate maxillary posterior implantation because of tooth extraction wound and tension from bone graft. Bone graft materials exposure has a significant detrimental influence on bone augmentation. However, previous studies lack sufficient evidence to guide wound closure after immediate posterior implantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!