Assisted reproductive technologies can aid conservation efforts via support of population management and preservation of genetic material. Data from 38 sperm collection attempts from 17 polar bears (1-5 procedures/bear) were evaluated. Sample collections were attempted via electroejaculation (EEJ; = 6), urethral catheterization (UC; = 25), or sperm rescue (SR; = 7) during the breeding season (Jan. 1-May 21; = 27) and nonbreeding season (May 22-Dec. 31; = 11). Sperm retrieval was successful in 1 EEJ (16.7%), 18 UC (72.0%) and 4 SR (57.1%) collections. Initial sperm motility and viability were 50.0% and 77.0% for EEJ, 64.3 ± 7.4% and 80.9 ± 3.8% for UC, and 56.7 ± 8.8% and 80.5 ± 0.5% for SR. UC and SR were more likely to be successful during the breeding season (84.2-100%) than the nonbreeding season (25.0-33.3%). Testicular tumors were observed in four males (57%) during SR. In total, 13 samples were cryopreserved ( = 1 EEJ, 9 UC, and 3 SR) with egg-yolk-based equine extender (EQ) or OptiXcell (OP). For both extenders, post-thaw motility and viability were reduced by 20-60% and 30-65%, respectively. Further efforts to optimize procedures are warranted, but this summary provides data useful for enhancing the success of polar bear sperm collection and cryopreservation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868262 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12040430 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!