The design of extremely large segmented-mirror telescopes (ELTs) calls for their segments to be phased, and a number of different interferometric techniques have been proposed in the literature for this purpose. To achieve the required large capture ranges for ELTs (typically a few microns), most of these techniques use measurements at multiple wavelengths, similar to what is done in standard distance-measuring laser interferometry. In this paper, we present a -based framework not tied to a specific phasing technique to obtain intersegment edge heights from multiwavelength data. We show how this scheme can be used to select an optimal set of wavelengths that maximizes the capture range while achieving the very low error rates required for ELT phasing. We take into account the wavelength uncertainty associated with the finite-width interference filters used in on-sky phasing. Finally, we present data from the Keck 2 telescope that illustrate the method for three-wavelength phasing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.447439DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

segmented-mirror telescopes
8
multiple wavelengths
8
capture range
8
phasing
5
approach based
4
based phasing
4
phasing segmented-mirror
4
telescopes multiple
4
wavelengths data
4
data reduction
4

Similar Publications

Piston Error Automatic Correction for Segmented Mirrors via Deep Reinforcement Learning.

Sensors (Basel)

June 2024

Space Optics Department, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China.

The segmented mirror co-phase error identification technique based on supervised learning methods has the advantages of simple application conditions, no dependence on custom sensors, a fast calculation speed, and low computing power requirements compared with other methods. However, it is often difficult to obtain a high accuracy in practical application situations with this method because of the difference between the training model and the actual model. The reinforcement learning algorithm does not need to model the real system when operating the system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For segmented telescopes, achieving fine co-focus adjustment is essential for realizing co-phase adjustment and maintenance, which involves adjusting the millimeter-scale piston between segments to fall within the capture range of the co-phase detection system. CGST proposes using a SHWFS for piston detection during the co-focus adjustment stage. However, the residual piston after adjustment exceeds the capture range of the broadband PSF phasing algorithm( ± 30μm), and the multi-wavelength PSF algorithm requires even higher precision in co-focus adjustment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large aperture ground-based segmented telescopes typically use electrical edge sensors to detect co-phase errors. However, complex observing environments can lead to zero-point drift of the edge sensors, making it challenging to maintain the long-term co-phase of the segmented primary mirror using only edge sensors. Therefore, employing optical piston error detection methods for short-term calibration of edge sensors can address the issue of zero-point drift in the sensors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It has been well-established that for the extremely large segmented-mirror telescopes (ELTs) currently under construction, segment clocking (in-plane rotation) will result in piston errors between neighboring segments. By contrast, the Keck telescopes utilize a fundamentally different edge sensor geometry, which should in principle render them insensitive to this effect. However, we show that as the result of a systematic internal misalignment of the Keck edge sensors, they in fact suffer from clocking-dependent effects that are remarkably similar to those anticipated for segmented-mirror ELTs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interferometric methods for phasing the primary mirrors of segmented-mirror telescopes generally need to make measurements at multiple wavelengths in order to achieve suitably large edge height capture ranges. In the presence of measurement errors, such methods have the potential for grossly wrong measurements, so-called edge jumps. In this paper, we investigate the causes of edge jumps using the example of Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) phasing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!