AI Article Synopsis
- The World Health Organization (WHO) and NHS England advocate for hand washing and hand sanitizer use to reduce disease transmission, particularly COVID-19, without fully assessing the environmental impact of these methods.
- A life cycle assessment (LCA) in the UK found that isopropanol-based hand sanitizer had the lowest environmental impact among the hand hygiene options studied, producing less CO2 compared to ethanol-based sanitizer and various handwashing methods.
- While isopropanol hand sanitizer is better for planetary health, all hand hygiene practices have environmental costs, emphasizing the need for further research and consideration of environmental impact in public health campaigns.
Article Abstract
In order to reduce the transmission of pathogens, and COVID-19, WHO and NHS England recommend hand washing (HW) and/or the use of hand sanitizer (HS). The planetary health consequences of these different methods of hand hygiene have not been quantified. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to compare the environmental impact of the UK population practising increased levels of hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic for 1 year. Washing hands with soap and water was compared to using hand sanitizer (both ethanol and isopropanol based sanitizers were studied). The isopropanol-based HS had the lowest environmental impact in 14 out of the 16 impact categories used in this study. For climate change, hand hygiene using isopropanol HS produced the equivalent of 1060 million kg CO, compared to 1460 million for ethanol HS, 2300 million for bar soap HW, and 4240 million for liquid soap HW. For both the ethanol and isopropanol HS, the active ingredient was the greatest overall contributing factor to the environmental impact (83.24% and 68.68% respectively). For HW with liquid soap and bar soap, there were additional contributing factors other than the soap itself: for example tap water use (28.12% and 48.68% respectively) and the laundering of a hand towel to dry the hands (10.17% and 17.92% respectively). All forms of hand hygiene have an environmental cost, and this needs to be weighed up against the health benefits of preventing disease transmission. When comparing hand sanitizers to handwashing with soap and water, this study found that using isopropanol based hand sanitizer is better for planetary health. However, no method of hand hygiene was ideal; isopropanol had a greater fossil fuel resource use than ethanol based hand sanitizer. More research is needed to find hand hygiene sources which do not diminish planetary health, and environmental impact is a consideration for public health campaigns around hand hygiene.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865176 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18918-4 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Effect of Nursing Practice Environment, Nurse Staffing, Overtime and Hand Hygiene on Hospital-Acquired Infections in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital.
J Clin Nurs
December 2024
School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Aims: To investigate the impact of the nursing practice environment, nurse staffing, working overtime and compliance with hand hygiene standards on hospital-acquired infections.
Design: A multi-source quantitative study.
Methods: Nursing data were collected from selected wards in one hospital between 18 January 2021 and 15 March 2021.
[Analysis of the level of serum-neutralizing antibodies against Coxsackievirus A6 in a healthy population in Tianjin City from 2014 to 2020].
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi
December 2024
Office of Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin300011, China.
To investigate the level of serum-neutralizing antibodies against Coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6) in a healthy population in Tianjin City from 2014 to 2020. From March 2014 to March 2020, 5 492 healthy volunteers were recruited in Tianjin City. The demographic information, personal hygiene habits, living environment hygiene, contact history with hand, foot and mouth disease cases within 6 months before the survey, history of upper respiratory tract infection, and medical history of the subjects were investigated using a self-designed questionnaire.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPromoting hand hygiene in a chemotherapy day center: the role of a robot.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
December 2024
Infection Control Team, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong West Cluster, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Background: Hand hygiene is a critical component of infection prevention in healthcare settings. Innovative strategies are required to enhance hand hygiene practices among patients and healthcare workers (HCWs).
Methods: This study was conducted at the Chemotherapy Day Center of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Right-sizing expectations for hand hygiene observation collection.
Am J Infect Control
December 2024
Center for Research, Practice and Innovation, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, APIC, Arlington, VA.
Background: Hand Hygiene (HH) monitoring is essential for patient and staff safety, but the optimal number of observations remains elusive. This project aimed to determine a statistically comparable number below the current standard of 100 to 200 per month per unit.
Methods: HH observations from various hospitals were grouped in strata by facility, unit, and month, then resampled into sets of 25, 50, 100, and 150 for comparison with 200.
Bacterial contamination of mobile handwashing stations in hospital settings in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
December 2024
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Background: As part of the containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, mobile handwashing stations (mHWS) were deployed in healthcare facilities in low-resource settings. We assessed mHWS in hospitals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo for contamination with Gram-negative bacteria.
Methods: Water and soap samples of in-use mHWS in hospitals in Kinshasa and Lubumbashi were quantitatively cultured for Gram-negative bacteria which were tested for antibiotic susceptibility.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!