Purpose: This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.
Results: Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.
Conclusion: Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.
Level Of Evidence: Level IV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864882 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03008-5 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Surg Res
February 2022
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.
J Exp Orthop
April 2021
Department of Anatomy, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Purpose: To measure the safe range of angles during tunnel drilling and map ideal patella tunnel placement with the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and compare results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels between a) a free-hand technique, and b) its modification with the use of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibia aiming device.
Methods: CT scan was performed on 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees a) prior to any intervention and b) after MPFL reconstruction. For MPFL reconstruction, specimens were randomly allocated to 1) Group A, which consisted of knees operated with free-hand, hardware-free patellar fixation technique with two semi-patellar tunnels and 2) Group B, which consisted of knees operated on with a technique modification with the ACL tibia device.
Med Sci Monit
December 2017
Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to describe a new safe and economical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with satisfactory clinical outcomes, and present the results of a four-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with recurrent patella dislocation, who underwent MPFL reconstruction with two semi-patellar tunnels and hardware-free patellar fixation between 2011 and 2013, were included in the study. Patella stability was tested by an apprehension test preoperatively and at follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2018
Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, Johanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus, Am Hasenberg 46, 41462, Neuss, Germany.
Purpose: Even if medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a proven method, complications such as implant loosening, patella fractures, recurrent luxations, knee pain or knee stiffness are frequently described. Besides a correct tunnel positioning and implant-specific complications, this might be caused by difficulties with an appropriate graft tensioning. The study presented here is a necessary first step in exploring our technique of a double-limbed, hardware-free MPFL reconstruction, which provides another way to test and adjust the graft tension before permanent fastening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
April 2018
MVZ Oberstdorf, Orthopaedic Specialty Clinic, Teaching Hospital of the University of Ulm, Trettachstrasse 16, 87561, Oberstdorf, Germany.
Purpose: In adults, reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has shown good results. Treatment for recurrent patellar instability in children and adolescents with open growth plates, however, requires alternative MPFL reconstruction techniques. This study presents the outcomes of a minimally invasive technique for anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL in children using a pedicled superficial quadriceps tendon graft, hardware-free patellar graft attachment, and anatomic femoral fixation that spares the distal femoral physis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!